Re-Align *_freeze_max_age reloption limits with corresponding GUC limits.

In 020235a I lowered the autovacuum_*freeze_max_age minimums to
allow for easier testing of wraparounds. I did not touch the
corresponding per-table limits. While those don't matter for the purpose
of wraparound, it seems more consistent to lower them as well.

It's noteworthy that the previous reloption lower limit for
autovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age was too high by one magnitude, even
before 020235a.

Discussion: 26377.1443105453@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch: back to 9.0 (in parts), like the prior patch

Author: anarazel

src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c

@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ static relopt_int intRelOpts[] =
 			RELOPT_KIND_HEAP | RELOPT_KIND_TOAST,
 			ShareUpdateExclusiveLock
 		},
-		-1, 100000000, 2000000000
+		-1, 100000, 2000000000
 	},
 	{
 		{
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static relopt_int intRelOpts[] =
 			RELOPT_KIND_HEAP | RELOPT_KIND_TOAST,
 			ShareUpdateExclusiveLock
 		},
-		-1, 100000000, 2000000000
+		-1, 10000, 2000000000
 	},
 	{
 		{