Very simple concurrent programming in Python

Question

I have a simple Python script that uses two much more complicated Python scripts, and does something with the results.

I have two modules, Foo and Bar, and my code is like the following:

import Foo
import Bar

output = []

a = Foo.get_something()
b = Bar.get_something_else()

output.append(a)
output.append(b)

Both methods take a long time to run, and neither depends on the other, so the obvious solution is to run them in parallel. How can I achieve this, but make sure that the order is maintained: Whichever one finishes first must wait for the other one to finish before the script can continue.

Let me know if I haven't made myself clear enough, I've tried to make the example code as simple as possible.

Amber · Accepted Answer · 2012-05-07 01:41:16Z

22

In general, you'd use threading to do this.

First, create a thread for each thing you want to run in parallel:

import threading

import Foo
import Bar

results = {}

def get_a():
    results['a'] = Foo.get_something()
a_thread = threading.Thread(target=get_a)
a_thread.start()

def get_b():
    results['b'] = Bar.get_something_else()
b_thread = threading.Thread(target=get_b)
b_thread.start()

Then to require both of them to have finished, use .join() on both:

a_thread.join()
b_thread.join()

at which point your results will be in results['a'] and results['b'], so if you wanted an ordered list:

output = [results['a'], results['b']]

Note: if both tasks are inherently CPU-intensive, you might want to consider multiprocessing instead - due to Python's GIL, a given Python process will only ever use one CPU core, whereas multiprocessing can distribute the tasks to separate cores. However, it has a slightly higher overhead than threading, and thus if the tasks are less CPU-intensive, it might not be as efficient.

edited May 7, 2012 at 1:41

answered May 7, 2012 at 0:30

Amber

531k89 gold badges643 silver badges558 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

5 Comments

akaRem Over a year ago

Threading is helpful for code with idling. If it has a lot of heavy calculation, you should advise multiprocessing, because threading will only add lags in this case.

ivystopia Over a year ago

Yes it's very CPU intensive. I'll get this working first however; I had a quick look and the APIs are identical.

ivystopia Over a year ago

I've been trying for a while now, but I'm constantly getting the error: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'join' That's referring to a_thread every time. b_thread works as expected.

Amber Over a year ago

@Blazemore I've edited the code slightly, there was a slight issue with it.

ivystopia Over a year ago

Do you know why I might have issues with accessing the results dictionary? I get key errors. Getting the functions to write to any global variable is also giving me issues; it's just not writing them.

fazkan · Accepted Answer · 2024-03-08 00:11:46Z

import multiprocessing

import Foo
import Bar

results = {}

def get_a():
    results['a'] = Foo.get_something()



def get_b():
    results['b'] = Bar.get_something_else()

process_a = multiprocessing.Process(target=get_a)
process_b = multiprocessing.Process(target=get_b)


process_b.start()
process_a.start()


process_a.join
process_b.join

Here is the process version of your program.

NOTE: that in threading there are shared datastructures so you have to worry about locking which avoids wrong manipulation of data plus as amber mentioned above it also has a GIL (Global interpreter Lock) problem and since both of your tasks are CPU intensive then this means that it will take more time because of the calls notifying the threads of thread acquisition and release. If however your tasks were I/O intensive then it does not effect that much.

Now since there are no shared datastructures in a process thus no worrying about LOCKS and since it works irrespective of the GIL so you actually enjoy the real power of multiprocessors.

Simple note to remember: process is the same as thread just without using a shared datastructures (everything works in isolation and is focused on messaging.)

check out https://www.dabeaz.com/tutorials.html he gave a good presentation on concurrent programming once.

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Very simple concurrent programming in Python

2 Answers 2

5 Comments

Comments

Your Answer

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

2 Answers 2

5 Comments

Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Related