Commit 14f2f9e
committed
Add CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in scram_SaltedPassword() for the backend
scram_SaltedPassword() could take a long time to compute when the number
of iterations used is large enough, and this code uses a tight loop to
compute a salted password.
Note that the same issue exists in libpq when using \password and a
large iteration number, but this cannot be interrupted. A CFI in the
backend is useful for server-side computations, at least.
Backpatch down to 16, where the user-settable GUC scram_iterations has
been added.
Author: Bowen Shi
Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev, Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAM_vCueV6xfr08KczfaCEk5J_qeTZtgqN7+orkNLx=g+phE82Q@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 161 parent 930d2b4 commit 14f2f9e
1 file changed
+11
-0
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
22 | 22 | | |
23 | 23 | | |
24 | 24 | | |
| 25 | + | |
| 26 | + | |
| 27 | + | |
25 | 28 | | |
26 | 29 | | |
27 | 30 | | |
| |||
73 | 76 | | |
74 | 77 | | |
75 | 78 | | |
| 79 | + | |
| 80 | + | |
| 81 | + | |
| 82 | + | |
| 83 | + | |
| 84 | + | |
| 85 | + | |
| 86 | + | |
76 | 87 | | |
77 | 88 | | |
78 | 89 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments