Fix isolation test to be less timing-dependent

I did this by adding another locking process, which makes the other two
wait.  This way the output should be stable enough.

Per buildfarm and Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180103034445.t3utrtrnrevfsghm@alap3.anarazel.de

Author: alvherre

src/test/isolation/expected/multiple-cic.out

@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
-Parsed test spec with 2 sessions
+Parsed test spec with 3 sessions
 
-starting permutation: s2l s1i s2i
+starting permutation: s2l s1i s2i s3u
+pg_advisory_lock
+
+               
 step s2l: SELECT pg_advisory_lock(281457);
 pg_advisory_lock
 
@@ -11,9 +14,11 @@ step s1i:
  <waiting ...>
 step s2i: 
 		CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY mcic_two_pkey ON mcic_two (id)
-		WHERE unlck();
+		WHERE unlck() AND lck_shr(572814);
+ <waiting ...>
+step s3u: SELECT unlck();
+unlck          
 
+t              
 step s1i: <... completed>
-s1             
-
-               
+step s2i: <... completed>

src/test/isolation/specs/multiple-cic.spec

@@ -26,15 +26,19 @@ session "s1"
 step "s1i"	{
 		CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY mcic_one_pkey ON mcic_one (id)
 		WHERE lck_shr(281457);
-	}
-teardown	{ SELECT pg_advisory_unlock_all() AS "s1"; }
+}
+step "s1u"  { SELECT unlck(); }
 
 
 session "s2"
 step "s2l"  { SELECT pg_advisory_lock(281457); }
 step "s2i"	{
 		CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY mcic_two_pkey ON mcic_two (id)
-		WHERE unlck();
+		WHERE unlck() AND lck_shr(572814);
 	}
 
-permutation "s2l" "s1i" "s2i"
+session "s3"
+setup		{ SELECT pg_advisory_lock(572814); }
+step "s3u"	{ SELECT unlck(); }
+
+permutation "s2l" "s1i" "s2i" "s3u"