@@ -2146,3 +2146,101 @@ TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
21462146
21472147http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
21482148
2149+ From pgsql-general-owner+M19758=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org Wed Jan 23 11:33:11 2002
2150+ Return-path: <pgsql-general-owner+M19758=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org>
2151+ Received: from server1.pgsql.org (www.postgresql.org [64.49.215.9])
2152+ by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with SMTP id g0NGXAU13298
2153+ for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:33:10 -0500 (EST)
2154+ Received: (qmail 89931 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2002 16:32:58 -0000
2155+ Received: from unknown (HELO postgresql.org) (64.49.215.8)
2156+ by www.postgresql.org with SMTP; 23 Jan 2002 16:32:58 -0000
2157+ Received: from barry.xythos.com (h-64-105-36-191.SNVACAID.covad.net [64.105.36.191])
2158+ by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g0NG9Tl75462
2159+ for <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:09:29 -0500 (EST)
2160+ (envelope-from barry@xythos.com)
2161+ Received: from xythos.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
2162+ by barry.xythos.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0N1sGn24841;
2163+ Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:54:16 -0800
2164+ Message-ID: <3C4E17C8.8040909@xythos.com>
2165+ Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:54:16 -0800
2166+ From: Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com>
2167+ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011221
2168+ X-Accept-Language: en-us
2169+ MIME-Version: 1.0
2170+ To: Nic Ferrier <nferrier@tapsellferrier.co.uk>
2171+ cc: Doug McNaught <doug@wireboard.com>, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
2172+ Subject: Re: [GENERAL] implemention of calls to stored procs.
2173+ References: <87sn8yx6xu.fsf@tf1.tapsellferrier.co.uk> <m3r8oh6i1a.fsf@varsoon.denali.to> <87n0z5yjer.fsf@tf1.tapsellferrier.co.uk>
2174+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
2175+ Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
2176+ Precedence: bulk
2177+ Sender: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
2178+ Status: OR
2179+
2180+ Nic,
2181+
2182+ Check out http://www.rootshell.be/~hornyakl/download
2183+ This has the latest code for pl/pgj. The Java procedure language support
2184+ that Laszlo Hornyak (hornyakl@users.sourceforge.net) has been working on
2185+ for the last month or so.
2186+
2187+ thanks,
2188+ --Barry
2189+
2190+
2191+ Nic Ferrier wrote:
2192+
2193+ > Firstly, thanks for your responses... good to know I was thinking the
2194+ > right thing (and, yes, I was taking the process thing into account,
2195+ > tho' I didn't realise threads weren't used at all).
2196+ >
2197+ >
2198+ > Doug McNaught <doug@wireboard.com> writes:
2199+ >
2200+ >
2201+ >>Nic Ferrier <nferrier@tapsellferrier.co.uk> writes:
2202+ >>
2203+ >>
2204+ >>>I've been looking at the implementation of the procedural language
2205+ >>>support code with a view to writing a java plugin (ie: something to
2206+ >>>allow java classes to be used as stored procs).
2207+ >>>
2208+ >>
2209+ >>Someone else has been talking about this--check the archives from the
2210+ >>last six months.
2211+ >>
2212+ >
2213+ > I couldn't find any reference but the archive searcher is broken right
2214+ > now and a manual search is not very reliable.
2215+ >
2216+ > It's not terribly difficult to crack this actually... I was going to
2217+ > use GCJ as a platform for a base java class that could be used like a
2218+ > quick C stored proc.
2219+ >
2220+ > I envisage having a natively implemented JDBC Connection passed to an
2221+ > init method in such a class.
2222+ >
2223+ >
2224+ > GCJ is perfect for this task because it has a native call interface,
2225+ > CNI, which is a seamless part of the class heirarchy.
2226+ >
2227+ > Once I've got something working I'll drop a line here.
2228+ >
2229+ >
2230+ >
2231+ > Nic
2232+ >
2233+ > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
2234+ > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
2235+ >
2236+ > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
2237+ >
2238+ >
2239+
2240+
2241+
2242+ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
2243+ TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
2244+ subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
2245+ message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
2246+
0 commit comments