Don't require a user mapping for FDWs to work.

Commit fbe5a3f accidentally changed
this behavior; put things back the way they were, and add some
regression tests.

Report by Andres Freund; patch by Ashutosh Bapat, with a bit of
kibitzing by me.

Author: robertmhaas

contrib/file_fdw/input/file_fdw.source

@@ -173,6 +173,9 @@ SET ROLE file_fdw_user;
 \t on
 EXPLAIN (VERBOSE, COSTS FALSE) SELECT * FROM agg_text WHERE a > 0;
 \t off
+-- file FDW allows foreign tables to be accessed without user mapping
+DROP USER MAPPING FOR file_fdw_user SERVER file_server;
+SELECT * FROM agg_text ORDER BY a;
 
 -- privilege tests for object
 SET ROLE file_fdw_superuser;

contrib/file_fdw/output/file_fdw.source

@@ -322,6 +322,17 @@ EXPLAIN (VERBOSE, COSTS FALSE) SELECT * FROM agg_text WHERE a > 0;
    Foreign File: @abs_srcdir@/data/agg.data
 
 \t off
+-- file FDW allows foreign tables to be accessed without user mapping
+DROP USER MAPPING FOR file_fdw_user SERVER file_server;
+SELECT * FROM agg_text ORDER BY a;
+  a  |    b    
+-----+---------
+   0 | 0.09561
+  42 |  324.78
+  56 |     7.8
+ 100 |  99.097
+(4 rows)
+
 -- privilege tests for object
 SET ROLE file_fdw_superuser;
 ALTER FOREIGN TABLE agg_text OWNER TO file_fdw_user;
@@ -333,9 +344,8 @@ SET ROLE file_fdw_superuser;
 -- cleanup
 RESET ROLE;
 DROP EXTENSION file_fdw CASCADE;
-NOTICE:  drop cascades to 8 other objects
+NOTICE:  drop cascades to 7 other objects
 DETAIL:  drop cascades to server file_server
-drop cascades to user mapping for file_fdw_user on server file_server
 drop cascades to user mapping for file_fdw_superuser on server file_server
 drop cascades to user mapping for no_priv_user on server file_server
 drop cascades to foreign table agg_text

contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out

@@ -1958,13 +1958,30 @@ EXECUTE join_stmt;
 
 -- change the session user to view_owner and execute the statement. Because of
 -- change in session user, the plan should get invalidated and created again.
--- While creating the plan, it should throw error since there is no user mapping
--- available for view_owner.
+-- The join will not be pushed down since the joining relations do not have a
+-- valid user mapping.
 SET SESSION ROLE view_owner;
 EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF, VERBOSE) EXECUTE join_stmt;
-ERROR:  user mapping not found for "view_owner"
-EXECUTE join_stmt;
-ERROR:  user mapping not found for "view_owner"
+                            QUERY PLAN                            
+------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Limit
+   Output: t1.c1, t2.c1
+   ->  Sort
+         Output: t1.c1, t2.c1
+         Sort Key: t1.c1, t2.c1
+         ->  Hash Left Join
+               Output: t1.c1, t2.c1
+               Hash Cond: (t1.c1 = t2.c1)
+               ->  Foreign Scan on public.ft4 t1
+                     Output: t1.c1, t1.c2, t1.c3
+                     Remote SQL: SELECT c1 FROM "S 1"."T 3"
+               ->  Hash
+                     Output: t2.c1
+                     ->  Foreign Scan on public.ft5 t2
+                           Output: t2.c1
+                           Remote SQL: SELECT c1 FROM "S 1"."T 4"
+(16 rows)
+
 RESET ROLE;
 DEALLOCATE join_stmt;
 CREATE VIEW v_ft5 AS SELECT * FROM ft5;
@@ -2021,6 +2038,40 @@ EXECUTE join_stmt;
 ----+----
 (0 rows)
 
+-- If a sub-join can't be pushed down, upper level join shouldn't be either.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS false, VERBOSE)
+SELECT t1.c1, t2.c1 FROM (ft5 t1 JOIN v_ft5 t2 ON (t1.c1 = t2.c1)) left join (ft5 t3 JOIN v_ft5 t4 ON (t3.c1 = t4.c1)) ON (t1.c1 = t3.c1);
+                            QUERY PLAN                            
+------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Hash Join
+   Output: t1.c1, ft5.c1
+   Hash Cond: (t1.c1 = ft5.c1)
+   ->  Hash Right Join
+         Output: t1.c1
+         Hash Cond: (t3.c1 = t1.c1)
+         ->  Hash Join
+               Output: t3.c1
+               Hash Cond: (t3.c1 = ft5_1.c1)
+               ->  Foreign Scan on public.ft5 t3
+                     Output: t3.c1, t3.c2, t3.c3
+                     Remote SQL: SELECT c1 FROM "S 1"."T 4"
+               ->  Hash
+                     Output: ft5_1.c1
+                     ->  Foreign Scan on public.ft5 ft5_1
+                           Output: ft5_1.c1
+                           Remote SQL: SELECT c1 FROM "S 1"."T 4"
+         ->  Hash
+               Output: t1.c1
+               ->  Foreign Scan on public.ft5 t1
+                     Output: t1.c1
+                     Remote SQL: SELECT c1 FROM "S 1"."T 4"
+   ->  Hash
+         Output: ft5.c1
+         ->  Foreign Scan on public.ft5
+               Output: ft5.c1
+               Remote SQL: SELECT c1 FROM "S 1"."T 4"
+(27 rows)
+
 -- recreate the dropped user mapping for further tests
 CREATE USER MAPPING FOR CURRENT_USER SERVER loopback;
 DROP USER MAPPING FOR PUBLIC SERVER loopback;

contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c

@@ -3910,6 +3910,16 @@ foreign_join_ok(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *joinrel, JoinType jointype,
 	List	   *joinclauses;
 	List	   *otherclauses;
 
+	/*
+	 * Core code may call GetForeignJoinPaths hook even when the join
+	 * relation doesn't have a valid user mapping associated with it. See
+	 * build_join_rel() for details. We can't push down such join, since
+	 * there doesn't exist a user mapping which can be used to connect to the
+	 * foreign server.
+	 */
+	if (!OidIsValid(joinrel->umid))
+		return false;
+
 	/*
 	 * We support pushing down INNER, LEFT, RIGHT and FULL OUTER joins.
 	 * Constructing queries representing SEMI and ANTI joins is hard, hence

contrib/postgres_fdw/sql/postgres_fdw.sql

@@ -478,11 +478,10 @@ EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF, VERBOSE) EXECUTE join_stmt;
 EXECUTE join_stmt;
 -- change the session user to view_owner and execute the statement. Because of
 -- change in session user, the plan should get invalidated and created again.
--- While creating the plan, it should throw error since there is no user mapping
--- available for view_owner.
+-- The join will not be pushed down since the joining relations do not have a
+-- valid user mapping.
 SET SESSION ROLE view_owner;
 EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF, VERBOSE) EXECUTE join_stmt;
-EXECUTE join_stmt;
 RESET ROLE;
 DEALLOCATE join_stmt;
 
@@ -506,6 +505,10 @@ CREATE USER MAPPING FOR view_owner SERVER loopback;
 EXPLAIN (COSTS false, VERBOSE) EXECUTE join_stmt;
 EXECUTE join_stmt;
 
+-- If a sub-join can't be pushed down, upper level join shouldn't be either.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS false, VERBOSE)
+SELECT t1.c1, t2.c1 FROM (ft5 t1 JOIN v_ft5 t2 ON (t1.c1 = t2.c1)) left join (ft5 t3 JOIN v_ft5 t4 ON (t3.c1 = t4.c1)) ON (t1.c1 = t3.c1);
+
 -- recreate the dropped user mapping for further tests
 CREATE USER MAPPING FOR CURRENT_USER SERVER loopback;
 DROP USER MAPPING FOR PUBLIC SERVER loopback;

src/backend/foreign/foreign.c

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
 extern Datum pg_options_to_table(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
 extern Datum postgresql_fdw_validator(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
 
-static HeapTuple find_user_mapping(Oid userid, Oid serverid);
+static HeapTuple find_user_mapping(Oid userid, Oid serverid, bool missing_ok);
 
 /*
  * GetForeignDataWrapper -	look up the foreign-data wrapper by OID.
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ GetUserMapping(Oid userid, Oid serverid)
 	bool		isnull;
 	UserMapping *um;
 
-	tp = find_user_mapping(userid, serverid);
+	tp = find_user_mapping(userid, serverid, false);
 
 	um = (UserMapping *) palloc(sizeof(UserMapping));
 	um->umid = HeapTupleGetOid(tp);
@@ -250,14 +250,23 @@ GetUserMapping(Oid userid, Oid serverid)
  *
  * If no mapping is found for the supplied user, we also look for
  * PUBLIC mappings (userid == InvalidOid).
+ *
+ * If missing_ok is true, the function returns InvalidOid when it does not find
+ * required user mapping. Otherwise, find_user_mapping() throws error if it
+ * does not find required user mapping. 
  */
 Oid
-GetUserMappingId(Oid userid, Oid serverid)
+GetUserMappingId(Oid userid, Oid serverid, bool missing_ok)
 {
 	HeapTuple	tp;
 	Oid			umid;
 
-	tp = find_user_mapping(userid, serverid);
+	tp = find_user_mapping(userid, serverid, missing_ok);
+
+	Assert(missing_ok || tp);
+
+	if (!tp && missing_ok)
+		return InvalidOid;
 
 	/* Extract the Oid */
 	umid = HeapTupleGetOid(tp);
@@ -273,9 +282,13 @@ GetUserMappingId(Oid userid, Oid serverid)
  *
  * If no mapping is found for the supplied user, we also look for
  * PUBLIC mappings (userid == InvalidOid).
+ *
+ * If missing_ok is true, the function returns NULL, if it does not find
+ * the required user mapping. Otherwise, it throws error if it does not
+ * find the required user mapping.
  */
 static HeapTuple
-find_user_mapping(Oid userid, Oid serverid)
+find_user_mapping(Oid userid, Oid serverid, bool missing_ok)
 {
 	HeapTuple	tp;
 
@@ -292,10 +305,15 @@ find_user_mapping(Oid userid, Oid serverid)
 						 ObjectIdGetDatum(serverid));
 
 	if (!HeapTupleIsValid(tp))
-		ereport(ERROR,
-				(errcode(ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_OBJECT),
-				 errmsg("user mapping not found for \"%s\"",
-						MappingUserName(userid))));
+	{
+		if (missing_ok)
+			return NULL;
+		else
+			ereport(ERROR,
+					(errcode(ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_OBJECT),
+					 errmsg("user mapping not found for \"%s\"",
+							MappingUserName(userid))));
+	}
 
 	return tp;
 }

src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c

@@ -180,11 +180,15 @@ build_simple_rel(PlannerInfo *root, int relid, RelOptKind reloptkind)
 		 * ensure that it gets invalidated in the case of a user OID change.
 		 * See RevalidateCachedQuery and more generally the hasForeignJoin
 		 * flags in PlannerGlobal and PlannedStmt.
+		 *
+		 * It's possible, and not necessarily an error, for rel->umid to be
+		 * InvalidOid even though rel->serverid is set.  That just means there
+		 * is a server with no user mapping.
 		 */
 		Oid		userid;
 
 		userid = OidIsValid(rte->checkAsUser) ? rte->checkAsUser : GetUserId();
-		rel->umid = GetUserMappingId(userid, rel->serverid);
+		rel->umid = GetUserMappingId(userid, rel->serverid, true);
 	}
 	else
 		rel->umid = InvalidOid;
@@ -435,12 +439,16 @@ build_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root,
 	 *
 	 * Otherwise those fields are left invalid, so FDW API will not be called
 	 * for the join relation.
+	 *
+	 * For FDWs like file_fdw, which ignore user mapping, the user mapping id
+	 * associated with the joining relation may be invalid. A valid serverid
+	 * distinguishes between a pushed down join with no user mapping and
+	 * a join which can not be pushed down because of user mapping mismatch.
 	 */
 	if (OidIsValid(outer_rel->serverid) &&
 		inner_rel->serverid == outer_rel->serverid &&
 		inner_rel->umid == outer_rel->umid)
 	{
-		Assert(OidIsValid(outer_rel->umid));
 		joinrel->serverid = outer_rel->serverid;
 		joinrel->umid = outer_rel->umid;
 		joinrel->fdwroutine = outer_rel->fdwroutine;

src/include/foreign/foreign.h

@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ typedef struct ForeignTable
 extern ForeignServer *GetForeignServer(Oid serverid);
 extern ForeignServer *GetForeignServerByName(const char *name, bool missing_ok);
 extern UserMapping *GetUserMapping(Oid userid, Oid serverid);
-extern Oid GetUserMappingId(Oid userid, Oid serverid);
+extern Oid GetUserMappingId(Oid userid, Oid serverid, bool missing_ok);
 extern UserMapping *GetUserMappingById(Oid umid);
 extern ForeignDataWrapper *GetForeignDataWrapper(Oid fdwid);
 extern ForeignDataWrapper *GetForeignDataWrapperByName(const char *name,