Commit bab64ef
committed
Fix two problems in infer_arbiter_indexes().
The first is a pretty simple bug where a relcache entry is used after
the relation is closed. In this particular situation it does not appear
to have bad consequences unless compiled with RELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE.
The second is that infer_arbiter_indexes() skipped indexes that aren't
yet valid according to indcheckxmin. That's not required here, because
uniqueness checks don't care about visibility according to an older
snapshot. While thats not really a bug, it makes things undesirably
non-deterministic. There is some hope that this explains a test failure
on buildfarm member jaguarundi.
Discussion: 9096.1431102730@sss.pgh.pa.us1 parent de76884 commit bab64ef
1 file changed
+5
-7
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
547 | 547 | | |
548 | 548 | | |
549 | 549 | | |
550 | | - | |
551 | | - | |
| 550 | + | |
| 551 | + | |
| 552 | + | |
| 553 | + | |
552 | 554 | | |
553 | | - | |
554 | | - | |
555 | | - | |
556 | | - | |
557 | 555 | | |
558 | 556 | | |
559 | 557 | | |
| |||
566 | 564 | | |
567 | 565 | | |
568 | 566 | | |
| 567 | + | |
569 | 568 | | |
570 | 569 | | |
571 | 570 | | |
572 | | - | |
573 | 571 | | |
574 | 572 | | |
575 | 573 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments