Commit c91a9b5
committed
Fix backup-block numbering in redo of b-tree split.
I got the backup block numbers off-by-one in the commit that changed the
way incomplete-splits are handled. I blame the comments, which said
"backup block 1" and "backup block 2", even though the backup blocks
are numbered starting from 0, in the macros and functions used in replay.
Fix the comments and the code.
Per Jeff Janes' bug report about corruption caused by torn page writes.
The incorrect code is new in git master, but backpatch the comment change
down to 9.0, where the numbering in the redo-side macros was changed.1 parent eb56812 commit c91a9b5
2 files changed
+10
-10
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
1299 | 1299 | | |
1300 | 1300 | | |
1301 | 1301 | | |
1302 | | - | |
| 1302 | + | |
1303 | 1303 | | |
1304 | 1304 | | |
1305 | 1305 | | |
| |||
1320 | 1320 | | |
1321 | 1321 | | |
1322 | 1322 | | |
1323 | | - | |
| 1323 | + | |
1324 | 1324 | | |
1325 | 1325 | | |
1326 | 1326 | | |
| |||
1333 | 1333 | | |
1334 | 1334 | | |
1335 | 1335 | | |
1336 | | - | |
| 1336 | + | |
1337 | 1337 | | |
1338 | 1338 | | |
1339 | 1339 | | |
1340 | | - | |
| 1340 | + | |
1341 | 1341 | | |
1342 | 1342 | | |
1343 | 1343 | | |
| |||
1353 | 1353 | | |
1354 | 1354 | | |
1355 | 1355 | | |
1356 | | - | |
| 1356 | + | |
1357 | 1357 | | |
1358 | 1358 | | |
1359 | 1359 | | |
| |||
1386 | 1386 | | |
1387 | 1387 | | |
1388 | 1388 | | |
1389 | | - | |
| 1389 | + | |
1390 | 1390 | | |
1391 | 1391 | | |
1392 | 1392 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
300 | 300 | | |
301 | 301 | | |
302 | 302 | | |
303 | | - | |
304 | | - | |
| 303 | + | |
| 304 | + | |
305 | 305 | | |
306 | 306 | | |
307 | 307 | | |
| |||
439 | 439 | | |
440 | 440 | | |
441 | 441 | | |
442 | | - | |
| 442 | + | |
443 | 443 | | |
444 | 444 | | |
445 | | - | |
| 445 | + | |
446 | 446 | | |
447 | 447 | | |
448 | 448 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments