Serving on a board isn’t just about saving money — it’s about protecting people. When safety issues are ignored, board members can be sued personally. Documented hazards like broken sidewalks must be fixed fast, not “next meeting.” We’ve also seen how education changes everything. Board training covers year-end financials, new laws, foreclosure basics, and why reserves matter. After tragedies like Champlain Towers, mandatory structural reserves exist for a reason. Funding them now prevents massive special assessments later — and keeps residents safe. Before signing any big contract, we bring the attorney in early. A short review now beats years of headaches later. Clear scope, dates, deliverables, penalties — that’s how we protect the association. Good faith matters. When we act transparently, prioritize safety, and communicate with residents about insurance and responsibilities, we lead well and sleep well. That’s the standard we hold ourselves to. #HOAmanagement #HOAboard #PropertyManagement #HOAtips #CommunityLeadership #BoardTraining #MandatoryReserves #CondoSafety #HOAlaw #ProtectYourCommunity
More Relevant Posts
-
📣 Make complaints Ombudsman-ready ❌ Cases bouncing between teams ✅ Clear, evidence-based responses ✨ Small daily choices = fewer escalations and stronger trust. 🧭 Spot complaints at first contact 🗂️ Log and triage correctly 🔎 Investigate with evidence 📝 Write clear, defensible responses ⏱️ Set timelines and next steps 🎓 @upkeeptraining: practical skills for real-world housing maintenance. 🔗 Explore the course via the link in comments ✉️ hello@upkeeptraining.co.uk | ☎️ 0208 123 0804 Sarah Bentley Lynda Hance Richard Powell Jo Ashby Tina P. Roy Clougher #housingprofessionals #complaintshandling #housingombudsman #repairsandmaintenance #ukhousing #socialhousing #tenantengagement #upkeeptraining
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Apportionment under the DBPA: Court points to the limits in the wake of Pafburn. Insurance Partners Jonathan Newby, Laura Reisz, and Senior Associate John Georgas unpack the Supreme Court of NSW’s latest decision in Kapila v Monument Building Group Pty Ltd [2025] NSWSC 1306, clarifying how first instance courts may seek to apply Pafburn to apportionment under the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW). Key insights: 1. No apportionment for breaches under section 37 of the DBPA, even without delegation. 2. Cross-claims remain the only way to recover contributions. 3. Continuing uncertainty on the interpretation of Pafburn. With these developments, builders, designers and other practitioners should review their risk strategies and contractual protections. Read the full article: https://lnkd.in/gq5whn8H #ConstructionLaw #DBPA #LegalUpdate #RiskManagement
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
In my latest article with Jonathan Newby and Laura Reisz, we explore the Supreme Court of NSW’s latest decision in Kapila v Monument Building Group Pty Ltd [2025] NSWSC 1306, indicating how first instance courts may seek to apply Pafburn to apportionment under the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW). Read the full article here: https://lnkd.in/gSfaZNu2
Apportionment under the DBPA: Court points to the limits in the wake of Pafburn. Insurance Partners Jonathan Newby, Laura Reisz, and Senior Associate John Georgas unpack the Supreme Court of NSW’s latest decision in Kapila v Monument Building Group Pty Ltd [2025] NSWSC 1306, clarifying how first instance courts may seek to apply Pafburn to apportionment under the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW). Key insights: 1. No apportionment for breaches under section 37 of the DBPA, even without delegation. 2. Cross-claims remain the only way to recover contributions. 3. Continuing uncertainty on the interpretation of Pafburn. With these developments, builders, designers and other practitioners should review their risk strategies and contractual protections. Read the full article: https://lnkd.in/gq5whn8H #ConstructionLaw #DBPA #LegalUpdate #RiskManagement
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Apportionment under the DBPA: Court points to the limits in the wake of Pafburn. In my latest article with Laura Reisz and John Georgas, we explore the Supreme Court of NSW’s latest decision in Kapila v Monument Building Group Pty Ltd [2025] NSWSC 1306, clarifying how first instance courts may seek to apply Pafburn to apportionment under the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW). Read the full article here: https://lnkd.in/gAU5yE-Z #ConstructionLaw #DBPA #LegalUpdate #RiskManagement
Apportionment under the DBPA: Court points to the limits in the wake of Pafburn. Insurance Partners Jonathan Newby, Laura Reisz, and Senior Associate John Georgas unpack the Supreme Court of NSW’s latest decision in Kapila v Monument Building Group Pty Ltd [2025] NSWSC 1306, clarifying how first instance courts may seek to apply Pafburn to apportionment under the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW). Key insights: 1. No apportionment for breaches under section 37 of the DBPA, even without delegation. 2. Cross-claims remain the only way to recover contributions. 3. Continuing uncertainty on the interpretation of Pafburn. With these developments, builders, designers and other practitioners should review their risk strategies and contractual protections. Read the full article: https://lnkd.in/gq5whn8H #ConstructionLaw #DBPA #LegalUpdate #RiskManagement
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The Public Shaming Wall A late or non-compliant AFSS isn't a quiet administrative issue. These statements are public records, and many local councils in NSW now maintain and publish online lists of buildings that have failed to submit their AFSS on time. This can directly impact your property's reputation, making it harder to attract tenants or buyers, and can even affect property valuations. It turns a compliance issue into a very public mark against your building's credibility and safety. https://lnkd.in/gMZv6xUd #PublicRecord, #ReputationRisk, #Compliance, #FireSafety, #Strata, #CommercialRealEstate, #PropertyValue, #TenantTrust, #DueDiligence, #BuildingManagement, #NSWCouncil, #Transparency, #BusinessRisk, #PropertyInvestment, #ShameList.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Hull City Council is supporting Damp and Mould Action and Awareness Week, helping to raise awareness of this serious issue. From 27 October 2025, the introduction of Awaab’s Law means that all social landlords are legally required to address all emergency hazards within 24 hours and all damp and mould hazards presenting significant risk of harm within ten working days. We are committed to these achieving these changes and all HCC officers that could potentially step into our tenants’ home are being fully trained on how to spot the early warning signs and what to do for you them if they spot an issue.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Hull City Council is supporting Damp and Mould Action and Awareness Week, helping to raise awareness of this serious issue. From 27 October 2025, the introduction of Awaab’s Law means that all social landlords are legally required to address all emergency hazards within 24 hours and all damp and mould hazards presenting significant risk of harm within ten working days. We are committed to these achieving these changes and all HCC officers that could potentially step into our tenants’ home are being fully trained on how to spot the early warning signs and what to do for you them if they spot an issue.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Phase 1 of Awaab’s Law is now in effect, introducing tighter deadlines for resolving emergency and serious mould and damp concerns. With a 43% surge in repair-related complaints reported by the Housing Ombudsman, housing providers are facing mounting pressure to respond swiftly and effectively. Gallagher Bassett is here to help. Our teams are supporting clients with robust complaints handling and surge response strategies, ensuring compliance and continuity in the face of rising demand. To find out how we can support, reach out to Ashley Easen, Director of Consulting.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
If you’re looking for directions, our Policy Director may not be your best choice. But if you’re looking for information about Prop 4, he’s got you covered. Here are two facts about how Prop 4 spending oversight will work: 1. Prop 4 would require the Legislature to formally transfer or “appropriate” funding from the Texas Water Fund to the Texas Water Development Board before any money is spent. 2. The governor signed a new law in June that strengthens legislative oversight of state water financial assistance and requires regular reporting to both legislators and the public on how the funds are used and the impact that they’re having. For more information about Prop 4, visit texaswater.org/prop4
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Michigan's Supreme Court recently declined to hear Progressive Marathon Ins. Co. v. Espinoza-Solis, effectively changing how insurers handle non-cooperative insureds. Read the latest from Sarah Beaubien about the potentially substantial financial implications for coverage providers: https://lnkd.in/gRrFcQdC #liability #michiganlaw
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
More from this author
-
Simplicity Over Complexity: Making Reserve Investment Rules Work for Real HOA & Condo Boards
Affinity Management Services, LLC 6mo -
Is Your Community on Track? Why Clear Goals Matter for Association Success
Affinity Management Services, LLC 7mo -
Proposed Florida Legislation: What Community Association Managers Should Know About Conflicts of Interest, Recalls & Hurricane Protection
Affinity Management Services, LLC 7mo