Creating an instance of a interface in c#

Question

I am using an interface in C# and rather than write an entirely new class which implements that interface is it possible to just create an object which implements that interface? The interface is defined as

public interface ITokenStore
{

    IToken CreateRequestToken(IOAuthContext context);


    IToken CreateAccessToken(IOAuthContext context);
}

And I know in java I could something like

ITokenStore tokenStore = new ITokenStore()
    {
        IToken CreateRequestToken(IOAuthContext context) {
            IToken requestToken = null;

            return requestToken;
        }

        IToken CreateAccessToken(IOAuthToken context) {
            IToken accessToken = null;

            return accessToken;
        }
    };

Is there an equivalent way to instantiate in instance of an interface in c#?

Java is still creating a class behind-the-scenes, it's just syntactic sugar - and in a way, their solution to a lack of delegates/function pointers. — Dai
– Dai, Commented Jul 17, 2013 at 19:27
With a mocking framework you can create an instance, for example new Mock<ITokenStore>(). You might want to setup concrete implementations of the methods which the mocking framework might do from a delegate. — Jeppe Stig Nielsen
– Jeppe Stig Nielsen, Commented Jul 17, 2013 at 19:33

Lasse V. Karlsen · Accepted Answer · 2013-07-17 19:26:39Z

14

The only way to "Create an instance of a interface in c#" is to create an instance of a type implementing the interface.

answered Jul 17, 2013 at 19:26

Lasse V. Karlsen

394k107 gold badges651 silver badges845 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

3 Comments

Sriram Sakthivel Over a year ago

It will be compiled as a anonymous class.

Lasse V. Karlsen Over a year ago

No, you cannot do this in .NET/C#, and to be clear, you can't do it in Java either. What the compiler does in Java is to build the anonymous type for you, a type implementing the interface. So Java has a shortcut to getting that type, C# doesn't.

Michael Over a year ago

@LasseV.Karlsen While C# may not, MS's C# compiler does: see oakio's answer below. It's just not part of any spec (and its use is limited at best), so it's really not a good idea to use.

oakio · Accepted Answer · 2013-07-17 20:03:58Z

5

If you really want this:

    private static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        IFoo foo = new IFoo(); // <- interface
        foo.Print();

        Console.ReadKey();
    }


    [ComImport, Guid("A7D5E89D-8FBD-44B7-A300-21FAB4833C00"), CoClass(typeof(Foo))]
    public interface IFoo
    {
        void Print();
    }

    public class Foo : IFoo
    {
        public void Print()
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Hello!");
        }
    }

But if you open compiled assembly on ildasm.exe, you will see:

IL_0001: newobj instance void TestApp.Program/Foo::.ctor()

edited Jul 17, 2013 at 20:03

answered Jul 17, 2013 at 19:55

oakio

1,9081 gold badge14 silver badges22 bronze badges

Comments

Sam I am says Reinstate Monica · Accepted Answer · 2013-07-17 19:48:26Z

4

Interfaces have no logic in them by design. They simply don't actually do anything.

Instantiating one without an implementing class doesn't even make sense

edited Jul 17, 2013 at 19:48

answered Jul 17, 2013 at 19:28

Sam I am says Reinstate Monica

31.3k12 gold badges74 silver badges101 bronze badges

Comments

mkoertgen · Accepted Answer · 2013-07-17 20:05:14Z

2

As far as i know .NET does not have the Java concept of anonymous inner classes. There is a typical need for dynamic implementations of an interface in unit testing scenarios. So may be a look on some dynamic mocking frameworks may be interesting for you, for instance

Impromptu Interface (includes support for dynamic)
Moq

Have a look on NuGet gallery for packages tagged with mocking.

answered Jul 17, 2013 at 20:05

mkoertgen

1,01210 silver badges16 bronze badges

Comments

Tim · Accepted Answer · 2013-07-17 19:29:06Z

0

You can't create an instance of an interface in C#. You must create an instance of a class/type that implements that interface.

Might want to go read up on interfaces in C#. There's no way to "fake" it like Java does.

I'm kind if intrigued by this concept though since it is something available in another language. I suppose you could use an anonymous class with delegate parameters if your consumer knew how to fake duck typing. But that hardly seems worth it.

answered Jul 17, 2013 at 19:29

Tim

15.3k1 gold badge48 silver badges70 bronze badges

Comments

Yury Schkatula · Accepted Answer · 2013-07-17 19:31:24Z

0

Something like this:

public class MyTokenStore: ITokenStore
{
    public IToken CreateRequestToken(IOAuthContext context)
    {
        ...some code here...
    }
    public IToken CreateAccessToken(IOAuthContext context)
    {
        ...some code here...
    }
}

Then use it:

ITokenStore x = new MyTokenStore();

answered Jul 17, 2013 at 19:31

Yury Schkatula

5,3792 gold badges20 silver badges44 bronze badges

Comments

Chad · Accepted Answer · 2013-07-17 19:39:55Z

Like the others have said, no, this is not possible.

However, you could write one generalized class that has delegates for each method. Something like the following:

public class DelegateTokenStore : ITokenStore
{
    public delegate IToken TokenCreator(IOAuthContext context);
    public TokenCreator RequestTokenCreator { get; set; }
    public TokenCreator AccessTokenCreator { get; set; }

    public IToken CreateRequestToken(IOAuthContext context)
    {
        return RequestTokenCreator(context);
    }

    public IToken CreateAccessToken(IOAuthContext context)
    {
        return AccessTokenCreator(context);
    }
}

Then you could use it like this:

ITokenStore tokenStore = new DelegateTokenStore()
{
    RequestTokenCreator = (context) =>
    {
        IToken requestToken = null;
        return requestToken;
    },
    AccessTokenCreator = (context) =>
    {
        IToken accessToken = null;
        return accessToken;
    },
};

I'm not saying it's necessarily a good idea to take this approach. Like anything, the appropriateness depends on your use case.

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Creating an instance of a interface in c#

7 Answers 7

3 Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Your Answer

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

7 Answers 7

3 Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Linked

Related