0

I changed my method to generic method. What is happening now is that I was deserializing the class inside the methodB and accessing its methods which I can not do anymore.

<T> void methodB(Class<T> clazz) {
    T var;
    HashMap<String, T> hash = new HashMap<>();
}

void methodA () {
  methodB(classA.class);
}

Initially inside methodB with no generics,

var = mapper.convertValue(iter.next(), ClassA.class);
var.blah() //works fine

After using generics,

var = mapper.convertValue(iter.next(), clazz);
var.blah() //cannot resolve the method.

How do I access blah() method of classA?

10
  • You need to show more code. What error did you get exactly? Commented Dec 11, 2014 at 1:20
  • Error:() java: cannot find symbol. More code is in stackoverflow.com/questions/27413112/… Commented Dec 11, 2014 at 1:24
  • What's the type of var? What's the definition of that class? Commented Dec 11, 2014 at 1:31
  • 1
    What would happen if you called methodB(String.class)? String has no method blah. Commented Dec 11, 2014 at 1:39
  • 5
    This has nothing to do with serialization. It is a compiler error you are getting because your type parameter T is not restricted to a type having a blah method. You must specify a proper type boundary. Commented Dec 11, 2014 at 1:43

3 Answers 3

2

Thanks to Passing a class with type parameter as type parameter for generic method in Java. Solved using TypeToken

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Comments

0

I think you should use interfaces instead of generics, if you want to call the same 'blah' function on a variety of classes (A,X,Y,Z) (each of which has the same function signature)..

Your other option (if you cannot modify A, e.t.c) is to use reflection. read more about this in https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/reflect/

Comments

0

The line where you assign to var at runtime is absolutely irrelevant. The only thing that matters for compiling a call is the static (compile-time) type of var. Since T is unbounded (other than by Object), it is not known to support any methods, other than those provided by Object. Both pieces of code should fail to compile.

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.