Is it a naming issue? (your sample json has "type" but the query is using "Type")
e.g. the following is working for me using DynamoDB Local:
public static void main(String [] args) {
AmazonDynamoDBClient client = new AmazonDynamoDBClient(new BasicAWSCredentials("akey1", "skey1"));
client.setEndpoint("http://localhost:8000");
DynamoDBMapper mapper = new DynamoDBMapper(client);
client.createTable(new CreateTableRequest()
.withTableName("nested-data-test")
.withAttributeDefinitions(new AttributeDefinition().withAttributeName("desc").withAttributeType("S"))
.withKeySchema(new KeySchemaElement().withKeyType("HASH").withAttributeName("desc"))
.withProvisionedThroughput(new ProvisionedThroughput().withReadCapacityUnits(1L).withWriteCapacityUnits(1L)));
NestedData u = new NestedData();
u.setDesc("else");
Map<String, String> c = new HashMap<String, String>();
c.put("type", "some");
u.setConf(c);
mapper.save(u);
DynamoDBQueryExpression<NestedData> queryExpression = new DynamoDBQueryExpression<NestedData>();
queryExpression.withHashKeyValues(u);
queryExpression.withFilterExpression("conf.#t = :type")
.addExpressionAttributeNamesEntry("#t", "type") // returns nothing if use "Type"
.addExpressionAttributeValuesEntry(":type", new AttributeValue("some"));
for(NestedData u2 : mapper.query(NestedData.class, queryExpression)) {
System.out.println(u2.getDesc()); // "else"
}
}
NestedData.java:
@DynamoDBTable(tableName = "nested-data-test")
public class NestedData {
private String desc;
private Map<String, String> conf;
@DynamoDBHashKey
public String getDesc() { return desc; }
public void setDesc(String desc) { this.desc = desc; }
@DynamoDBAttribute
public Map<String, String> getConf() { return conf; }
public void setConf(Map<String, String> conf) { this.conf = conf; }
}