2

I am currently stuck with ASP.net 3.0, which means that I cannot use ASP.net MVC and ADO.net EF. While I can replace EF with Subsonic or ActiveRecord, I wonder what you guys recommend for MVC? I am interested in nice URLs and separation between View and Controller, two things that I always found hard with Webforms.

For now, I will give Castle MonoRail a spin, but if you have more suggestions i'd be happy as well.

2 Answers 2

2

Castle MonoRail seems indeed to be the only serious MVC Framework for .net 2.0/3.0, so I'll go with that.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

3 Comments

that's what i would suggest. y cant you use 3.5?
Not my server, no control over what goes on it and what not.
I was looking into Castle MonoRail myself. I'd say that it's your best bet at the moment.
1

There's a hacky, unofficial, unsupported workaround that allows you to deploy ASP.NET MVC on .NET 2.0 (and possibly .NET 3.0).

http://www.hanselman.com/blog/DeployingASPNETMVCOnASPNET20.aspx

1 Comment

Thanks. I believe to remember that this did not work with the MVC beta anymore, but I did not double check. Really hacky though

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.