static struct K { int x; };
Is this valid in C and C++?
-
3Why not just try it and see? When you find out that it isn't ask what your error is.user124493– user1244932011-03-05 17:47:30 +00:00Commented Mar 5, 2011 at 17:47
-
4You have no access to a compiler or something?Darin Dimitrov– Darin Dimitrov2011-03-05 17:47:39 +00:00Commented Mar 5, 2011 at 17:47
-
1@Darin these days everyone who has access to internet has access to compiler: ideone.com/YqWd8Andrey– Andrey2011-03-05 17:50:06 +00:00Commented Mar 5, 2011 at 17:50
-
8I think it's a reasonable question. What one compiler accepts, another may reject, and this doesn't really help to work out whether it's valid C and C++.please delete me– please delete me2011-03-05 17:55:42 +00:00Commented Mar 5, 2011 at 17:55
-
@Brone In this case, wouldn't any reasonable C compiler accept it and any reasonable C++ compiler reject it? It's certainly a reasonable question; I just get tired of getting excited and then clicking on a link for a question the OP could have answered on their own in about 30 seconds.user124493– user1244932011-03-06 19:59:06 +00:00Commented Mar 6, 2011 at 19:59
Add a comment
|
4 Answers
In C, it's valid but useless.
In C++ it's invalid. You can only specify storage class for objects and functions.
Comments
Valid in C. Ill-formed in C++
In C++, specifiers extern/static can only be applied to names of objects or functions
Check out
C.1.5 Clause 7: declarations (7.1.1) ISO C++03
Comments
No... That is not valid in C++. An alternative is (C++) : unnamed namespace
namespace
{
struct K { int x; };
}
See this related topic:
