1

Suppose that I am working on an application implementing single-table design in DynamoDB. The table holds organisations, and users resulting in something like this:

enter image description here

Using the AWS SDK, I am able to issue a QueryCommand against my table and retrieve all information and related records to my organisation (the red box in the image above) by running something like this:

const params = {
  TableName: 'dynamo-table-name',
  KeyConditionExpression: '#PK = :PK',
  ExpressionAttributeNames: {
    '#PK': 'PK',
  },
  ExpressionAttributeValues: {
    ':PK': 'ORG#MICROSOFT',
  },
};

const result = await client.send(new QueryCommand(params));

Since I am using @aws-sdk/lib-dynamodb the result comes back as an array of JS objects which is good, but I am running into the following problem. Once I have that data, I would like to do the following:

Convert this:

[
  {
    "PK": "ORG#MICROSOFT",
    "SK": "METADATA#MICROSOFT",
    "OrgName": "Microsoft",
    "PlanType": "Enterprise",
  },
  {
    "PK": "ORG#MICROSOFT",
    "SK": "USER#BILLGATES",
    "UserName": "Bill Gates",
    "UserType": "Member"
  },
  {
    "PK": "ORG#MICROSOFT",
    "SK": "USER#SATYANADELLA",
    "UserName": "Satya Nadella",
    "UserType": "Admin"
  }
]

To something like this:

{
    "result": [
        {
            "OrgName": "Microsoft",
            "PlanType": "Enterprise",
            "Users": [
                {
                    "UserName": "Bill Gates",
                    "UserType": "Member"
                },
                {
                    "UserName": "Satya Nadella",
                    "UserType": "Admin"
                }
                
            ]
        }
    ]
}

I have struggled with finding an elegant solution. My attempts up to this point made use of JavaScript's reduce function but they never end up feeling robust enough to be something I would really consider using. Most of my problems come from the fact that I would like it to also work if I was to not only have Users for an Organisation, but also something else like maybe Locations. I am also looking for something that, in the case where I search for all organizations, it could get them in the desired format. Does anyone have any suggestions on how I could do this?

3
  • 1
    Why is the result attribute in the desired object an array? Will you also query for multiple organizations (thus necessitating a filter/reduction on PK)? Commented Mar 2, 2022 at 18:34
  • Yes, I would also like to be able to query multiple organizations and get them in the desired format. I will add this to the description Commented Mar 2, 2022 at 18:38
  • 1
    I've added an answer that, while not performance optimized, is at least simple to maintain and enhance. Hope it's helpful. No doubt there is a one-pass solution that's more lines of code and less FP. Commented Mar 3, 2022 at 13:40

1 Answer 1

1

Here's an idea for how to solve this. Not sure if it substantially improves over what you already have tried. Embed the resulting result array as needed e.g. {result}.

This code uses repeated filters over the same data so, while easy to understand and modify, it's not optimal for a large dataset.

const records = [
  {
    PK: "ORG#MICROSOFT",
    SK: "METADATA#MICROSOFT",
    OrgName: "Microsoft",
    PlanType: "Enterprise",
  },
  {
    PK: "ORG#MICROSOFT",
    SK: "USER#BILLGATES",
    UserName: "Bill Gates",
    UserType: "Member",
  },
  {
    PK: "ORG#MICROSOFT",
    SK: "USER#SATYANADELLA",
    UserName: "Satya Nadella",
    UserType: "Admin",
  },
  {
    PK: "ORG#APPLE",
    SK: "METADATA#APPLE",
    OrgName: "Apple",
    PlanType: "Enterprise",
  },
  {
    PK: "ORG#APPLE",
    SK: "USER#TIMCOOK",
    UserName: "Tim Cook",
    UserType: "Admin",
  },
];

const orgs = records.filter((rec) => rec.OrgName);
const users = records.filter((rec) => rec.UserName);

const result = orgs.map((org) => ({
  OrgName: org.OrgName,
  PlanType: org.PlanType,
  Users: users
    .filter((user) => user.PK === org.PK)
    .map(({ UserName, UserType }) => ({ UserName, UserType })),
}));
console.log(result);

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

1 Comment

This is pretty much what I was looking for. I think I was moving towards something like this, but I wasn't sure if it made sense. Knowing that someone else came to a similar solution at least reassures me that it makes sense. Thanks!

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.