Sharing objects between Java classes without going via a method

Question

I'm looking at a way to add some tracing diagnostics to some legacy Java code. By legacy in this sense I mean I cannot change any of the methods. If we consider the following objects:

public class ClassIOwnAndCanChange {

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        // store my object here that I want to make
        // available in LegacyClassA and B
        myMethod("foo", 100);
    }    

}

public class LegacyClassA {

    // method I cannot change
    public void myMethod(String name, int timer) {

        //want to get my 'injected' object here so that I can, 
        //for instance, time this method
        methodCallThatTakesSomeTime("some param");

    }  

}

public class LegacyClassB {

    // method I cannot change
    public void methodCallThatTakesSomeTime(String name) {
        // want to get my 'injected' object here for
        // diagnostic reasons

    }

}

I own A and I would like to make an object available in B and C. What is the right way to do this in Java without changing the method that A calls on B and the method that B calls on C?

You will have to improve your question to get answers. Maybe provide example using some names for instance methodOfA, methodOfB etc. Seems to me from the title a static member may do the job, but it is possible I misunderstand you — Ivaylo Strandjev
– Ivaylo Strandjev, Commented Jun 21, 2013 at 13:12

Dave Newton · Accepted Answer · 2013-06-21 13:55:14Z

4

You can play all sorts of games with AOP (Aspect Oriented Programming) and/or other forms of bytecode manipulation.

Whether or not you should varies wildly.

It depends on your precise needs, and how you need to use the "injected" object. I'd consider AOP first since tools like AspectJ are mature. AOP and a ThreadLocal might be all you need.

edited Jun 21, 2013 at 13:55

answered Jun 21, 2013 at 13:23

Dave Newton

161k27 gold badges263 silver badges310 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

1 Comment

imrichardcole Over a year ago

Thanks for this answer and also the ThreadLocal suggestion. I'll investigate those two in detail

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Sharing objects between Java classes without going via a method

1 Answer 1

1 Comment

Your Answer

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

1 Answer 1

1 Comment

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Related