11

I stumbled over some strange LINQ to SQL behaviour - can anybody shed some light on this?

I want to define a lambda expression and use it in my LINQ statement. The following code works fine:

[...]
Func<Table1, bool> lambda = x => x.Id > 1000;
var result = dataContext.Table1s.Where(lambda);
[...]

But when I try to use my lambda expression in a statement on an associated table

[...]
Func<Table1, bool> lambda = x => x.Id > 1000;
var result = dataContext.Table2s.Where(x => x.Table1s.Any(lambda));
[...]

I get an exception:

Unsupported overload used for query operator 'Any'.

But, and this I don't get: It works fine when I put my lambda directly into the query:

[...]
var result = dataContext.Table2s.Where(x => x.Table1s.Any(y => y.Id > 1000));
[...]

WHY?!

Thanks.

2
  • Try using var lamda = x => x.Id > 1000;. Don't know it'll help, but it might... Commented Dec 30, 2010 at 11:21
  • @Alxandr - that's not legal actually. Lambda expressions can be compiled to either Func<> or Expression<Func<>> and in your example the compiler won't be able to tell which one you want, and will throw an error. Commented Dec 30, 2010 at 19:07

2 Answers 2

20

Okay, here's the deal: dataContext.Table1s is of type IQueryable<T>. IQueryable<T> defines Where and Any methods that take a predicate of type Expression<Func<T, bool>>. The Expression<> wrapper is critical, as this is what allows LINQ to SQL to translate your lambda expression to SQL and execute it on the database server.

However, IQueryable<T> also includes IEnumerable<T>. IEnumerable<T> also defines Where and Any methods, but the IEnumerable version takes a predicate of type Func<T, bool>. Because this is a compiled function and not an expression, it can't be translated to SQL. As a result, this code...

Func<Table1, bool> lambda = x => x.Id > 1000;
var result = dataContext.Table1s.Where(lambda);

...will pull EVERY record out of Table1s into memory, and then filter the records in memory. It works, but it's really bad news if your table is large.

Func<Table1, bool> lambda = x => x.Id > 1000;
var result = dataContext.Table2s.Where(x => x.Table1s.Any(lambda));

This version has two lambda expressions. The second one, being passed directly into Where, is an Expression that includes a reference to a Func. You can't mix the two, and the error message you're getting is telling you that the call to Any is expecting an Expression but you're passing in a Func.

var result = dataContext.Table2s.Where(x => x.Table1s.Any(y => y.Id > 1000));

In this version, your inner lambda is automatically being converted to an Expression because that's the only choice if you want your code to be transformed into SQL by LINQ to SQL. In the other cases, you're forcing the lambda to be a Func instead of an Expression - in this case you're not, so it works.

What's the solution? It's actually pretty simple:

Expression<Func<Table1, bool>> lambda = x => x.Id > 1000;
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

6 Comments

Thanks. Unfortunately it won't compile, the compiler error is: Argument 2: cannot convert from 'System.Linq.Expressions.Expression<System.Func<Table1,bool>>' to 'System.Func<Table1,bool>'
That error message seems to indicate that you're calling Where or an Any on an object that implements IEnumerable but not IQueryable - because the IEnumerable versions expect a Func, where the IQueryable versions expect an Expression. If it won't accept an Expression, the object may not be IQueryable...
It's defined as an EntitySet, as generated by SQLMetal/the Visual Studio Designer for LINQ to SQL table associations.
This article might be of help in your situation...
Thanks for the link, Joel. It doesn't solve my above problem, but it's very useful anyway and gave me some new ideas :)
|
0

Does Table1 refer to the same namespace? In the first example you're querying against the Table1 objects that are directly under dataContext, in the second example you're querying against the Table1 objects that is a property of the Table2 objects, and in the last example you're using a anonymous function which fix the issue.

I would look up the type of the Table1 objects that is a property of a Table2 object and compare it to a Table1 object that is connected directly to the dataContext. My guess is that they differ and your lambda expression is using the type of the object that is connected to the dataContext.

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.