How can I find an index of a certain value in a Java array of type int?
I tried using Arrays.binarySearch on my unsorted array, it only sometimes gives the correct answer.
Integer[] array = {1,2,3,4,5,6};
Arrays.asList(array).indexOf(4);
Note that this solution is threadsafe because it creates a new object of type List.
Also you don't want to invoke this in a loop or something like that since you would be creating a new object every time
Another option if you are using Guava Collections is Ints.indexOf
// Perfect storm:
final int needle = 42;
final int[] haystack = [1, 2, 3, 42];
// Spoiler alert: index == 3
final int index = Ints.indexOf(haystack, needle);
This is a great choice when space, time and code reuse are at a premium. It is also very terse.
A look at the API and it says you have to sort the array first
So:
Arrays.sort(array);
Arrays.binarySearch(array, value);
If you don't want to sort the array:
public int find(double[] array, double value) {
for(int i=0; i<array.length; i++)
if(array[i] == value)
return i;
}
Copy this method into your class
public int getArrayIndex(int[] arr,int value) {
int k = -1;
for(int i = 0;i < arr.length; i++){
if(arr[i] == value){
k = i;
break;
}
}
return k;
}
Call this method with pass two perameters Array and value and store its return value in a integer variable.
int indexNum = getArrayIndex(array,value);
Thank you
// Using Apache Commons third party libary
import org.apache.commons.lang3.ArrayUtils;
ArrayUtils.indexOf(array, value);
// Using Guava third party library
import com.google.common.primitives.Ints;
Ints.indexOf(array, value);
// Using standard library
// Doesn't create a copy, just wraps original array.
// ONLY WORKS FOR ARRAYS OF OBJECT TYPES, NOT PRIMITIVES!
import java.util.Arrays;
Arrays.asList(array).indexOf(value);
You can use modern Java to solve this problem. Please use the code below:
static int findIndexOf(int V, int[] arr) {
return IntStream.range(0, arr.length)
.filter(i->arr[i]==V)
.findFirst()
.getAsInt();
}
range is exclusive. Good catch on that first bug, though.java.util.NoSuchElementException i've had using this code. Well played SirYou could convert it to a list, then use the indexOf method:
Arrays.asList(array).indexOf(1);
http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/util/Arrays.html#asList(T...) http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/util/List.html#indexOf(java.lang.Object)
You need to sort values before using binary search. Otherwise, the manual way is to try all ints in your tab.
public int getIndexOf( int toSearch, int[] tab )
{
for( int i=0; i< tab.length ; i ++ )
if( tab[ i ] == toSearch)
return i;
return -1;
}//met
An alternative method could be to map all index for each value in a map.
tab[ index ] = value;
if( map.get( value) == null || map.get( value) > index )
map.put( value, index );
and then map.get(value) to get the index.
Regards, Stéphane
@pst, thanks for your comments. Can you post an other alternative method ?
Integer[] arr = { 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21 };
List<Integer> arrlst = Arrays.asList(arr);
System.out.println(arrlst.lastIndexOf(1));
In case anyone is still looking for the answer-
You can use ArrayUtils.indexOf() from the [Apache Commons Library][1].
If you are using Java 8 you can also use the Strean API:
public static int indexOf(int[] array, int valueToFind) {
if (array == null) {
return -1;
}
return IntStream.range(0, array.length)
.filter(i -> valueToFind == array[i])
.findFirst()
.orElse(-1);
}
The easiest way is to iterate. For example we want to find the minimum value of array and it's index:
public static Pair<Integer, Integer> getMinimumAndIndex(int[] array) {
int min = array[0];
int index = 0;
for (int i = 1; i < array.length; i++) {
if (array[i] < min) {
min = array[i];
index = i;
}
return new Pair<min, index>;
This way you test all array values and if some of them is minimum you also know minimums index. It can work the same with searching some value:
public static int indexOfNumber(int[] array) {
int index = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
if (array[i] == 77) { // here you pass some value for example 77
index = i;
}
}
return index;
}
/**
* Method to get the index of the given item from the list
* @param stringArray
* @param name
* @return index of the item if item exists else return -1
*/
public static int getIndexOfItemInArray(String[] stringArray, String name) {
if (stringArray != null && stringArray.length > 0) {
ArrayList<String> list = new ArrayList<String>(Arrays.asList(stringArray));
int index = list.indexOf(name);
list.clear();
return index;
}
return -1;
}
clear and the new ArrayList are unnecessary operations. Allocating a new ArrayList copies the whole array, which is pointless, because Arrays.asList already returns a List which has an indexOf method. Clearing the copy of the list is unnecessary, GC will take it away anyway.You can do it like this:
public class Test {
public static int Tab[] = {33,44,55,66,7,88,44,11,23,45,32,12,95};
public static int search = 23;
public static void main(String[] args) {
long stop = 0;
long time = 0;
long start = 0;
start = System.nanoTime();
int index = getIndexOf(search,Tab);
stop = System.nanoTime();
time = stop - start;
System.out.println("equal to took in nano seconds ="+time);
System.out.println("Index of searched value is: "+index);
System.out.println("De value of Tab with searched index is: "+Tab[index]);
System.out.println("==========================================================");
start = System.nanoTime();
int Bindex = bitSearch(search,Tab);
stop = System.nanoTime();
time = stop - start;
System.out.println("Binary search took nano seconds ="+time);
System.out.println("Index of searched value is: "+Bindex);
System.out.println("De value of Tab with searched index is: "+Tab[Bindex]);
}
public static int getIndexOf( int toSearch, int[] tab ){
int i = 0;
while(!(tab[i] == toSearch) )
{ i++; }
return i; // or return tab[i];
}
public static int bitSearch(int toSearch, int[] tab){
int i = 0;
for(;(toSearch^tab[i])!=0;i++){
}
return i;
}
}
Added a XOR :)
tab.equals(toSearch) is comparing an array with an int. Maybe tab[i] == toSearch instead.while (tab[i] != toSearch) i++; VS while ((tab[i] ^ toSearch) != 0) i++;.bitSearch is always faster than getIndexOf; while if I simply swap the calls to the two methods getIndexOf gets faster than bitSearch. This clearly demonstrates that the second one is always faster for some reason of JVM internals. You should be repeating the experiment many times (probably millions), averaging the values, discarding extreme values and doing a warmup that is very similar to the test.In the main method using for loops: -the third for loop in my example is the answer to this question. -in my example I made an array of 20 random integers, assigned a variable the smallest number, and stopped the loop when the location of the array reached the smallest value while counting the number of loops.
import java.util.Random;
public class scratch {
public static void main(String[] args){
Random rnd = new Random();
int randomIntegers[] = new int[20];
double smallest = randomIntegers[0];
int location = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < randomIntegers.length; i++){ // fills array with random integers
randomIntegers[i] = rnd.nextInt(99) + 1;
System.out.println(" --" + i + "-- " + randomIntegers[i]);
}
for (int i = 0; i < randomIntegers.length; i++){ // get the location of smallest number in the array
if(randomIntegers[i] < smallest){
smallest = randomIntegers[i];
}
}
for (int i = 0; i < randomIntegers.length; i++){
if(randomIntegers[i] == smallest){ //break the loop when array location value == <smallest>
break;
}
location ++;
}
System.out.println("location: " + location + "\nsmallest: " + smallest);
}
}
Code outputs all the numbers and their locations, and the location of the smallest number followed by the smallest number.
Binary search: Binary search can also be used to find the index of the array element in an array. But the binary search can only be used if the array is sorted. Java provides us with an inbuilt function which can be found in the Arrays library of Java which will rreturn the index if the element is present, else it returns -1. The complexity will be O(log n). Below is the implementation of Binary search.
public static int findIndex(int arr[], int t) {
int index = Arrays.binarySearch(arr, t);
return (index < 0) ? -1 : index;
}
Integer[] array = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6};
for (int i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
if (array[i] == 4) {
system.out.println(i);
break;
}
}
binarySearch: "Searches the specified array of ... for the specified value using the binary search algorithm. The array must be sorted (as by the sort(long[]) method) prior to making this call. If it is not sorted, the results are undefined. ..."