22

So, Python functions can return multiple values. It struck me that it would be convenient (though a bit less readable) if the following were possible.

a = [[1,2],[3,4]]

def cord():
    return 1, 1

def printa(y,x):
    print a[y][x]

printa(cord())

...but it's not. I'm aware that you can do the same thing by dumping both return values into temporary variables, but it doesn't seem as elegant. I could also rewrite the last line as "printa(cord()[0], cord()[1])", but that would execute cord() twice.

Is there an elegant, efficient way to do this? Or should I just see that quote about premature optimization and forget about this?

3 Answers 3

34
printa(*cord())

The * here is an argument expansion operator... well I forget what it's technically called, but in this context it takes a list or tuple and expands it out so the function sees each list/tuple element as a separate argument.

It's basically the reverse of the * you might use to capture all non-keyword arguments in a function definition:

def fn(*args):
    # args is now a tuple of the non-keyworded arguments
    print args

fn(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)

prints (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)

fn(*[1, 2, 3, 4, 5])

does the same.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

1 Comment

And the documentation: docs.python.org/tutorial/…
6

Try this:

>>> def cord():
...     return (1, 1)
...
>>> def printa(y, x):
...     print a[y][x]
...
>>> a=[[1,2],[3,4]]
>>> printa(*cord())
4

The star basically says "use the elements of this collection as positional arguments." You can do the same with a dict for keyword arguments using two stars:

>>> a = {'a' : 2, 'b' : 3}
>>> def foo(a, b):
...    print a, b
...
>>> foo(**a)
2 3

Comments

3

Actually, Python doesn't really return multiple values, it returns one value which can be multiple values packed into a tuple. Which means that you need to "unpack" the returned value in order to have multiples. A statement like

x,y = cord()

does that, but directly using the return value as you did in

printa(cord())

doesn't, that's why you need to use the asterisk. Perhaps a nice term for it might be "implicit tuple unpacking" or "tuple unpacking without assignment".

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.