Fix some antipatterns

[arnu515]

Description

Fixed some anti-patterns and best practices related to python.

Here's what I did:
Replace for if statements with any():
The any function is a builtin python function that returns True if atleast one item in a list is True, and False otherwise. It makes the code more readable and is faster than using for-if condition

Use in [...] instead of multiple ==:
In Python, it is recommended to use variable in [a, b, c, d] instead of saying variable == a or variable == b ... since it will be much faster, and more readable.

Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Documentation Update

Checklist:

Please tick all the boxes that are fulfilled by your Pull Request.

• I have named my files and folder, according to this project's guidelines.
• My code follows the style guidelines of this project.
• My Pull Request has a descriptive title. (not a vague title like Update index.md)
• I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
• I have created a helpful and easy to understand README.md, according to the given README_TEMPLATE.
• I have included a requirements.txt file (if external libraries are required.)
• My changes do not produce any warnings.
• I have added a working sample/screenshot of the script.