Skip to content

Conversation

@react-translations-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR was automatically generated.

Merge changes from react.dev at d271a7a

The following files have conflicts and may need new translations:

Please fix the conflicts by pushing new commits to this pull request, either by editing the files directly on GitHub or by checking out this branch.

DO NOT SQUASH MERGE THIS PULL REQUEST!

Doing so will "erase" the commits from main and cause them to show up as conflicts the next time we merge.

sky21kr and others added 30 commits September 1, 2025 14:32
Co-authored-by: unknown <deepanshu.9dd@gmail.com~>
`a expensive` should be `an expensive`
Fix "documentatino" typo to "documentation" in comment about useOptimistic reference page.
…d example of the use API (#7767)

* Update "Deep Dive" in reusing-logic-with-custom-hooks.md with link to and example of the use API

* Remove mention of Server Components when explaining the use API

* Update src/content/learn/reusing-logic-with-custom-hooks.md

Co-authored-by: Ricky <rickhanlonii@gmail.com>

* fix: Correct which lines are highlighted in code example

---------

Co-authored-by: Ricky <rickhanlonii@gmail.com>
The previous examples used a service called loremflickr.com to link to  placeholder images. Since that service is now down, I updated them to reference placecats.com instead, which we already use in other examples as well. placecats doesn't have the same random cat feature so I roughly approximated it in the example code.

Closes #7966
* Fix handleClick compiler intro example

* Use a note instead

* Update src/content/learn/react-compiler/introduction.md
* fix: changed source file names in docs from App.js, index.js and styles.css to src/ dir

* fix: updated wrong image with the correct one with current sandbox file structure

* refactor: reverted all formatting and just just mention src folder in introductory section

* Reverted changes tutorial-tic-tac-toe.md

* added enhanced image of sandbox
* docs: add flushSync Troubleshooting section

* Update src/content/reference/react-dom/flushSync.md

* oops

* Apply suggestions from code review

* formatting and pitfall

---------

Co-authored-by: Ricky <rickhanlonii@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Rick Hanlon <rickhanlonii@meta.com>
* correct IconExperimental naming and usage (from #7972)

Co-authored-by: Tuna <198469603+TunaDev0@users.noreply.github.com>

* Bump Activity to Canary in docs

---------

Co-authored-by: Tuna <198469603+TunaDev0@users.noreply.github.com>
Happened to notice we were still on an old version of the compiler. This PR upgrades us to use the latest RC.
Copied over our copyright script from the react repo. I made a small fix to handle shebangs.
* Add copyright script

Copied over our copyright script from the react repo. I made a small fix to handle shebangs.

* Update copyright on all files

Run the script.
…iler (#7988)

In facebook/react#34462 for example, we found an issue where the compiler was incorrectly validating an example straight from the docs.

In order to find more issues like this + also provide more feedback to doc authors on valid/invalid patterns, this PR adds a new local eslint rule which validates all markdown codeblocks containing components/hooks with React Compiler. An autofixer is also provided.

To express that a codeblock has an expected error, we can use the following metadata:

```ts
// pseudo type def
type MarkdownCodeBlockMetadata = {
    expectedErrors?: {
      'react-compiler'?: number[];
    };
  };
```

and can be used like so:

````
```js {expectedErrors: {'react-compiler': [4]}}
// ❌ setState directly in render
function Component({value}) {
  const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
  setCount(value); // error on L4
  return <div>{count}</div>;
}
```
````

Because this is defined as a local rule, we don't have the same granular reporting that `eslint-plugin-react-hooks` yet. I can look into that later but for now this first PR just sets us up with something basic.
* Add local eslint rule to validate markdown codeblocks with React Compiler

In facebook/react#34462 for example, we found an issue where the compiler was incorrectly validating an example straight from the docs.

In order to find more issues like this + also provide more feedback to doc authors on valid/invalid patterns, this PR adds a new local eslint rule which validates all markdown codeblocks containing components/hooks with React Compiler. An autofixer is also provided.

To express that a codeblock has an expected error, we can use the following metadata:

```ts
// pseudo type def
type MarkdownCodeBlockMetadata = {
    expectedErrors?: {
      'react-compiler'?: number[];
    };
  };
```

and can be used like so:

````
```js {expectedErrors: {'react-compiler': [4]}}
// ❌ setState directly in render
function Component({value}) {
  const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
  setCount(value); // error on L4
  return <div>{count}</div>;
}
```
````

Because this is defined as a local rule, we don't have the same granular reporting that `eslint-plugin-react-hooks` yet. I can look into that later but for now this first PR just sets us up with something basic.

* fix compiler errors

I went through the list of existing errors and tried to separate the expected errors from those that seem to be flagging unexpected issues.  In particular, our effects validations are flagging patterns that our own docs examples use. I added todos for these and will follow up later.
slorber and others added 29 commits October 13, 2025 12:39
Removed CityJS New Delhi 2025 conference details and added CityJS Singapore 2026, CityJS New Delhi 2026, and CityJS London 2026 conference details.
… (#8026)

* Fix Server Components link text to match target section heading

Change "React Server Components" to "Full-stack frameworks" in the
server-components.md link text to accurately reflect the destination
section heading

* Remove unnecessary RSC tags from Server Components documentation
…pis.md (#7990)

Because components link to /reference/react/components, I think hooks should link to /reference/react/hooks.
…/index.md (#7983)

Suggestion: Link to /reference/react/hooks rather than /reference/react. The preceding sentence refers to “If you are looking for Hooks that are supported in web browsers *and other environments* see [the React Hooks page](/reference/react/hooks). This page lists all the Hooks in the `react-dom` package.” which matches the React Hooks page better.
* clarify SRP definition

* Update src/content/learn/thinking-in-react.md

---------

Co-authored-by: Ricky <rickhanlonii@gmail.com>
* Remove esquery hack

* Add comment explaining next.config change
* fix: correct link for RedwoodJS to RedwoodSDK in documentation

* fix: update links for React Query and TanStack Start in documentation

* fix: update Vite installation command to use TypeScript template

* fix: update references from React Query to TanStack Query in documentation
Fixes #8097

The refactored example in the "Chains of computations" section uses
an incorrect condition that changes the game logic from the original.

The original Effect-based code advances the round after 4 gold cards:
- Increments first (0→1, 1→2, 2→3, 3→4)
- Then checks `goldCardCount > 3` (true when count is 4)

The refactored code with `goldCardCount <= 3` allows 5 gold cards:
- Checks before incrementing
- Allows counts 0, 1, 2, 3 to increment (4 values)
- Advances on the 5th card (when count is 4)

This fix changes the condition to `goldCardCount < 3`:
- Allows counts 0, 1, 2 to increment (3 values)
- Advances on the 4th card (when count is 3)
- Matches the original behavior

Verified by tracing execution logic and building the docs site locally.

Co-authored-by: PaulyBearCoding <PaulyBearCoding@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.