3

I read this C# Object Pooling Pattern implementation so my question: does one have to implement own Object Pooling strategy in ASP.NET whereas this exists in Java EE?

Well I'm upset as I prefer .net platform to java, but here in java it's done without being a guru. I'm surprised ASP.NET didn't implement at least the same and even better.

Improve this question
1
  • The lack of data connection pooling being built in drives me BERSERK! Commented Apr 29, 2011 at 14:54

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1

Recently I've learned that .NET covers this for atleast some scenarios.

BufferManager Class

Is an object pool for buffers. I don't see any readily available way to extend this for other purposes short of decompiliation & reverse engineering. However it's possible that a more usable class exists somewhere deep in .NET.

Also in regards to C# Object Pooling Pattern implementation the complexity involved in this will reduce substantially with .NET 4.0 having been released. The majority (or all) of the locking code could completely be swept away and replaced with the Concurrent data classes.

Improve this answer
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

2 Comments

Well I'm upset as I prefer .net platform to java, but here in java it's done without being a guru. I'm surprised ASP.NET didn't implement at least the same and even better.
Yes it would've been a great addition to the concurrent data classes they added if they had created a generic concurrent object pool class.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.