import re
ss = '''10/02/09
07/22/09
09-08-2008
9/9/2008
11/4/2010
03-07-2009
09/01/2010'''
regx = re.compile('[-/]')
for xd in ss.splitlines():
m,d,y = regx.split(xd)
print xd,' ','/'.join((m.zfill(2),d.zfill(2),'20'+y.zfill(2) if len(y)==2 else y))
result
10/02/09 10/02/2009
07/22/09 07/22/2009
09-08-2008 09/08/2008
9/9/2008 09/09/2008
11/4/2010 11/04/2010
03-07-2009 03/07/2009
09/01/2010 09/01/2010
Edit 1
And Edit 2 : taking account of the information on '{0:0>2}'.format(day) from JBernardo, I added a 4th solution, that appears to be the fastest
import re
from time import clock
iterat = 100
from datetime import datetime
dates = ['10/02/09', '07/22/09', '09-08-2008', '9/9/2008', '11/4/2010',
' 03-07-2009', '09/01/2010']
reobj = re.compile(
r"""\s* # optional whitespace
(\d+) # Month
[-/] # separator
(\d+) # Day
[-/] # separator
(?:20)? # century (optional)
(\d+) # years (YY)
\s* # optional whitespace""",
re.VERBOSE)
te = clock()
for i in xrange(iterat):
ndates = (reobj.sub(r"\1/\2/20\3", date) for date in dates)
fdates1 = [datetime.strftime(datetime.strptime(date,"%m/%d/%Y"), "%m/%d/%Y")
for date in ndates]
print "Tim's method ",clock()-te,'seconds'
regx = re.compile('[-/]')
te = clock()
for i in xrange(iterat):
ndates = (reobj.match(date).groups() for date in dates)
fdates2 = ['%s/%s/20%s' % tuple(x.zfill(2) for x in tu) for tu in ndates]
print "mixing solution",clock()-te,'seconds'
te = clock()
for i in xrange(iterat):
ndates = (regx.split(date.strip()) for date in dates)
fdates3 = ['/'.join((m.zfill(2),d.zfill(2),('20'+y.zfill(2) if len(y)==2 else y)))
for m,d,y in ndates]
print "eyquem's method",clock()-te,'seconds'
te = clock()
for i in xrange(iterat):
fdates4 = ['{:0>2}/{:0>2}/20{}'.format(*reobj.match(date).groups()) for date in dates]
print "Tim + format ",clock()-te,'seconds'
print fdates1==fdates2==fdates3==fdates4
result
number of iteration's turns : 100
Tim's method 0.295053700959 seconds
mixing solution 0.0459111423379 seconds
eyquem's method 0.0192239516475 seconds
Tim + format 0.0153756971906 seconds
True
The mixing solution is interesting because it combines the speed of my solution and the ability of the regex of Tim Pietzcker to detect dates in a string.
That's still more true for the solution combining Tim's one and the formating with {:0>2}. I cant' combine {:0>2} with mine because regx.split(date.strip()) produces year with 2 OR 4 digits