I'd use something like:
text = %q{
// ...
// comment
$myuser['bla'] = 'bla';
// comment
$myuser['bla2'] = 'bla2';
// ...
}
from_to = {
'bla' => 'foo',
'bla2' => 'bar'
}
puts text.gsub(/\['([^']+)'\] = '([^']+)'/) { |t|
key, val = t.scan(/'([^']+)'/).flatten
"['%s'] = '%s'" % [ key, from_to[key] ]
}
Which outputs:
// ...
// comment
$myuser['bla'] = 'foo';
// comment
$myuser['bla2'] = 'bar';
// ...
This is how it works:
If I do:
puts text.gsub(/\['([^']+)'\] = '([^']+)'/) { |t|
puts t
}
I see:
['bla'] = 'bla'
['bla2'] = 'bla2'
Then I tried:
"['bla'] = 'bla'".scan(/'([^']+)'/).flatten
=> ["bla", "bla"]
That gave me a key, "value" pair, so I could use a hash to look-up the replacement value.
Sticking it inside a gsub block meant whatever matched got replaced by my return value for the block, so I created a string to replace the "hit" and let gsub do its "thang".
I'm not a big believer in using long regex. I've had to maintain too much code that tried to use complex patterns, and got something wrong, and failed to accomplish what was intended 100% of the time. They're very powerful, but maintenance of code is a lot harder/worse than developing it, so I try to keep patterns I write in spoon-size pieces, having mercy on those who follow me in maintaining the code.