1

I am trying to overload operators of a C++ class using Boost.Python.

According to this, I am doing it the right way... but I have a bunch of compiler errors.

Here is a simple example I made trying to pinpoint the problem:

#include "boost/python.hpp"

using namespace boost::python;

class number
{
public:
    number(int i) : m_Number(i) { }
    number operator+(int i) { return number(m_Number + i); }
private:
    int m_Number;
};

BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(test)
{
    class_<number>("number", init<int>())
        .def(self() + int());
}

Here are the compiler errors:

Error   1   error C2064: term does not evaluate to a function taking 0 arguments    c:\users\kevin\documents\visual studio 2008\projects\boostpythontest\boostpythontest\test.cpp   16  BoostPythonTest
Error   2   error C2780: 'boost::python::class_<W> &boost::python::class_<W>::def(const char *,Fn,const A1 &,const A2 &,const A3 &)' : expects 5 arguments - 1 provided c:\users\kevin\documents\visual studio 2008\projects\boostpythontest\boostpythontest\test.cpp   16  BoostPythonTest
Error   3   error C2780: 'boost::python::class_<W> &boost::python::class_<W>::def(const char *,Fn,const A1 &,const A2 &)' : expects 4 arguments - 1 provided    c:\users\kevin\documents\visual studio 2008\projects\boostpythontest\boostpythontest\test.cpp   16  BoostPythonTest
Error   4   error C2780: 'boost::python::class_<W> &boost::python::class_<W>::def(const char *,A1,const A2 &)' : expects 3 arguments - 1 provided   c:\users\kevin\documents\visual studio 2008\projects\boostpythontest\boostpythontest\test.cpp   16  BoostPythonTest
Error   5   error C2780: 'boost::python::class_<W> &boost::python::class_<W>::def(const char *,F)' : expects 2 arguments - 1 provided   c:\users\kevin\documents\visual studio 2008\projects\boostpythontest\boostpythontest\test.cpp   16  BoostPythonTest

Am I missing something here ?

Thanks

1 Answer 1

2

I've not used boost.python, but your errors look like there are some incompatible arguments when some template magic tries to bind something to something else.

So I looked at the link you provided, and found one major difference:

class_<X>("X")
    .def(self + int())

vs yours

class_<number>("number", init<int>())
    .def(self() + int());

I guess, self and self() could do that.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.