0

I have a JSON string from an API response which looks like this:

{ "legend_size": 1,
  "data": {
    "series": [ "2013-05-01", "2013-05-02" ],
    "values": {
        "Sign Up": {
            "2013-05-05": 10,
            "2013-05-04": 10
         }
     }
  }
}

I'd like to sum the values in the "Sign Up" Object (10 + 10). The challenge I am having is that the key's are unique and most of the posts demonstrating how to do something like this show examples where it is just an array of values or the keys are consistent (ie - every key is "value").

Should I be attempting to use the Series array to loop through the Sign Up Object?

1
  • forgot to mention, my first step in trying to solve this was to use JSON.parse(string); to put it in to a JS Object. Not sure if that is necessary. Commented Jun 10, 2013 at 1:53

2 Answers 2

4

Assuming you've already got your data parsed into an object, you can use a for loop like this:

var json = {
    "legend_size": 1,
    "data": {
        "series": [ "2013-05-01", "2013-05-02" ],
        "values": {
            "Sign Up": {
                "2013-05-05": 10,
                "2013-05-04": 10
            }
        }
    }
};
var sum = 0;
for (x in json.data.values['Sign Up']) {
    sum += json.data.values['Sign Up'][x];
}

Basically, we navigate through the json data to get the the actual data that we want... which is the 'Sign Up' object. Then we use a for/in loop to loop through all the keys that that object has, and add up the values.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Comments

0

After you've parsed it, here's a way to arrive at the sum by using Array.prototype.reduce.

var vals = object.data.values["Sign Up"];

var result = Object.keys(vals)
                   .reduce(function(sum, key) {
                       return sum + vals[key]
                   }, 0);

The .reduce() and .keys() methods will need shims for IE8 and lower.

2 Comments

This works as well :) Thanks so much...any reason why this solution vs. @jcsanyi's would be any better/worse?
Just different approaches to the same problem. This one uses a functional approach, and is probably a little slower, but would only manifest itself on very large sets of data.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.