overloading operator * c++

Question

I have been trying to compile this program but it is giving me an error in regards to overloading the * operator for one of the functions: complex operator *(double n)const

When I try to compile I get the error: no match for 'operator*' in '2 * c'

Here is the header file:

Complex.h

#ifndef COMPLEX0_H
#define COMPLEX0_H

class complex {
    double realNum;
    double imagNum;
public:
    complex();
    complex(double x,double y);
    complex operator *(double n)const;
    complex operator *(const complex &c1)const;
   friend std::istream &operator>>(std::istream &is,complex &cm);
   friend std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &os,const complex &cm);
};

#endif

Here is the cpp:

Complex.cpp

 #include "iostream"
#include "complex0.h"

complex::complex() {
    imagNum = 0.0;
    realNum = 0.0;
}

complex::complex(double x, double y) {

    realNum = x;
    imagNum = y;
}

complex complex::operator *(const complex& c1) const{
complex sum;
sum.realNum=realNum*c1.realNum-c1.imagNum*imagNum;
sum.imagNum=realNum*c1.imagNum+imagNum*c1.realNum;
    return sum;
}

complex complex::operator *(double n)const{ 
    complex sum;
    sum.realNum=realNum*n;
    sum.imagNum=imagNum*n;
    return sum;

}
std::istream &operator >>(std::istream& is, complex& cm) {
    is >> cm.realNum>> cm.imagNum;
    return is;
}

std::ostream &operator <<(std::ostream& os, const complex& cm){
os<<"("<<cm.realNum<<","<<cm.imagNum<<"i)"<<"\n";    
return os;
}

main.cpp

#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
#include "complex0.h" 

    int main() {
        complex a(3.0, 4.0); 
        complex c;
        cout << "Enter a complex number (q to quit):\n";
        while (cin >> c) {
            cout << "c is " << c << "\n";
            cout << "a is " << a << "\n";
            cout << "a * c" << a * c << "\n";
            cout << "2 * c" << 2 * c << "\n";
            cout << "Enter a complex number (q to quit):\n";
        }
        cout << "Done!\n";
        return 0;
    }

Can someone explain to me what I have done wrong?

Because you only take complex on the left side, never a double. — Qaz
– Qaz, Commented Jul 17, 2013 at 19:18
The error I am getting is: no match for 'operator*' in '2 * c' — jis
– jis, Commented Jul 17, 2013 at 19:18
Every non-static function in your class has a first parameter of your class type. — Qaz
– Qaz, Commented Jul 17, 2013 at 19:22
Binary operators which do not assign should not be member functions. — aschepler
– aschepler, Commented Jul 17, 2013 at 19:27

Kerrek SB · Accepted Answer · 2013-07-17 19:19:20Z

3

The member function operator only applies when the first operand is of your class type. If you want to handle the case where the second operand is of your type, you need also a free function (in which we simply delegate to the member function by virtue of commutativity of the operation):

complex operator*(double n, complex const & x)
{
    return x * n;
}

(Please note that the standard library already contains <complex>.)

answered Jul 17, 2013 at 19:19

Kerrek SB

480k96 gold badges904 silver badges1.1k bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Comments

Bill Lynch · Accepted Answer · 2013-07-17 19:23:09Z

0

You have a member function defined as follows:

complex complex::operator *(double n) const;

That will let you do things like: complex_number * 3.0, but not 3.0 * complex_number. However, you can't create a member function that will let you do 3.0 * complex_number. The only place you could create that member function, is inside the definition of double, which you can't change.

Instead of doing it as member functions though, you can also do it as free-standing functions:

complex operator*(complex x, double n); // Called for complex_number * 2.0
complex operator*(double n, complex x); // Called for 2.0 * complex_number

answered Jul 17, 2013 at 19:23

Bill Lynch

82.3k16 gold badges132 silver badges181 bronze badges

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

overloading operator * c++

2 Answers 2

Comments

Comments

Your Answer

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

2 Answers 2

Comments

Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Linked

Related