Changing values in pandas dataframe does not work

Question

I’m having a problem changing values in a dataframe. I also want to consult regarding a problem I need to solve and the proper way to use pandas to solve it. I'll appreciate help on both. I have a file containing information about matching degree of audio files to speakers. The file looks something like that:

wave_path   spk_name    spk_example#    score   mark    comments    isUsed
190  122_65_02.04.51.800.wav     idoD    idoD    88  NaN     NaN     False
191  121_110_20.17.27.400.wav    idoD    idoD    87  NaN     NaN     False
192  121_111_00.34.57.300.wav    idoD    idoD    87  NaN     NaN     False
193  103_31_18.59.12.800.wav     idoD    idoD_0  99  HIT     VP  False
194  131_101_02.08.06.500.wav    idoD    idoD_0  96  HIT     VP  False

What I need to do, is some kind of a sophisticated counting. I need to group the results by speaker, and calculate for each speaker some calculation. I then proceed with the speaker that made the best calculation for me, but before proceeding I need to mark all the files which I used for the calculation as being used, i.e. changing the isUsed value for each row in which they appear (files can appear more than once) to TRUE. Then I make another iteration. Calculate for each speaker, mark the used files and so on until no more speakers left to be calculated.

I thought a lot about how to implement that process using pandas (it is quite easy to implement in regular python but it will take a lot of looping and data structuring that my guess will slow the process down significantly, and also I’m using this process to get to learn pandas abilities more deeply)

I came out with the following solution. As preparation steps, I’ll group by speaker name and set the file name as index by the set_index method. I will then iterate over the groupbyObj and apply the calculation function, which will return the selected speaker and the files to be marked as used.

Then I’ll iterate over the files and mark them as used (this would be fast and simple since I set them as indexes beforehand), and so on until I finish calculating.

First, I’m not sure about this solution, so feel free to tell me your thoughts on it. Now, I’ve tried implementing this, and got into trouble:

First I indexed by file name, no problem here:

In [53]:

    marked_results['isUsed'] = False
    ind_res = marked_results.set_index('wave_path')
    ind_res.head()

Out[53]:
    spk_name    spk_example#    score   mark    comments    isUsed
    wave_path                       
    103_31_18.59.12.800.wav      idoD    idoD    99  HIT     VP  False
    131_101_02.08.06.500.wav     idoD    idoD    99  HIT     VP  False
    144_35_22.46.38.700.wav      idoD    idoD    96  HIT     VP  False
    41_09_17.10.11.700.wav       idoD    idoD    93  HIT     TEST    False
    122_188_03.19.20.400.wav     idoD    idoD    93  NaN     NaN     False

Then I choose a file and checked that I get the entries relevant to that file:

In [54]:

    example_file = ind_res.index[0];
    ind_res.ix[example_file]

Out[54]:
    spk_name    spk_example#    score   mark    comments    isUsed
    wave_path                       
    103_31_18.59.12.800.wav  idoD    idoD    99  HIT     VP  False
    103_31_18.59.12.800.wav  idoD    idoD_0  99  HIT     VP  False
    103_31_18.59.12.800.wav  idoD    idoD_1  97  HIT     VP  False
    103_31_18.59.12.800.wav  idoD    idoD_2  95  HIT     VP  False

Now problems here too. Then I tried to change the isUsed value for that file to True, and that where I got the problem:

In [56]:

    ind_res.ix[example_file]['isUsed'] = True
    ind_res.ix[example_file].isUsed = True
    ind_res.ix[example_file]
Out[56]:
    spk_name    spk_example#    score   mark    comments    isUsed
    wave_path                       
    103_31_18.59.12.800.wav  idoD    idoD    99  HIT     VP  False
    103_31_18.59.12.800.wav  idoD    idoD_0  99  HIT     VP  False
    103_31_18.59.12.800.wav  idoD    idoD_1  97  HIT     VP  False
    103_31_18.59.12.800.wav  idoD    idoD_2  95  HIT     VP  False

So, you see the problem. Nothing has changed. What am I doing wrong? Is the problem described above should be solved using pandas?

And also: 1. How can I approach a specific group by a groupby object? bcz I thought maybe instead of setting the files as indexed, grouping by a file, and the using that groupby obj to apply a changing function to all of its occurrences. But I didn’t find a way to approach a specific group and passing the group name as parameter and calling apply on all the groups and then acting only on one of them seemed not "right" to me.

I hope it is not to long... :)

you are modifying a copy, the .ix[example_file,'isUsed'] see here: pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/dev/… — Jeff
– Jeff, Commented Aug 1, 2013 at 13:43

unutbu · Accepted Answer · 2013-08-14 10:08:17Z

23

Indexing Panda objects can return two fundamentally different objects: a view or a copy.

If mask is a basic slice, then df.ix[mask] returns a view of df. Views share the same underlying data as the original object (df). So modifying the view, also modifies the original object.

If mask is something more complicated, such as an arbitrary sequence of indices, then df.ix[mask] returns a copy of some rows in df. Modifying the copy has no affect on the original.

In your case, since the rows which share the same wave_path occur at arbitrary locations, ind_res.ix[example_file] returns a copy. So

ind_res.ix[example_file]['isUsed'] = True

has no effect on ind_res.

Instead, you could use

ind_res.ix[example_file, 'isUsed'] = True

to modify ind_res. However, see below for a groupby suggestion which I think might be closer to what you really want.

Jeff has already provided a link to the Pandas docs which state that

The rules about when a view on the data is returned are entirely dependent on NumPy.

Here are the (complicated) rules which describe when a view or copy is returned. Basically, however, the rule is if the index is requesting a regularly spaced slice of the underlying array then a view is returned, otherwise a copy (out of necessity) is returned.

Here is a simple example which uses basic slice. A view is returned by df.ix, so modifying subdf modifies df as well:

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

df = pd.DataFrame(np.arange(12).reshape(4,3), 
         columns=list('ABC'), index=[0,1,2,3])

subdf = df.ix[0]
print(subdf.values)
# [0 1 2]
subdf.values[0] = 100
print(subdf)
# A    100
# B      1
# C      2
# Name: 0, dtype: int32

print(df)           # df is modified
#      A   B   C
# 0  100   1   2
# 1    3   4   5
# 2    6   7   8
# 3    9  10  11

Here is a simple example which uses "fancy indexing" (arbitrary rows selected). A copy is returned by df.ix. So modifying subdf does not affect df.

df = pd.DataFrame(np.arange(12).reshape(4,3), 
         columns=list('ABC'), index=[0,1,0,3])

subdf = df.ix[0]
print(subdf.values)
# [[0 1 2]
#  [6 7 8]]

subdf.values[0] = 100
print(subdf)
#      A    B    C
# 0  100  100  100
# 0    6    7    8

print(df)          # df is NOT modified
#    A   B   C
# 0  0   1   2
# 1  3   4   5
# 0  6   7   8
# 3  9  10  11

Notice the only difference between the two examples is that in the first, where a view is returned, the index was [0,1,2,3], whereas in the second, where a copy is returned, the index was [0,1,0,3].

Since we are selected rows where the index is 0, in the first example, we can do that with a basic slice. In th second example, the rows where index equals 0 could appear at arbitrary locations, so a copy has to be returned.

Despite having ranted on about the subtlety of Pandas/NumPy slicing, I really don't think that

ind_res.ix[example_file, 'isUsed'] = True

is what you are ultimately looking for. You probably want to do something more like

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

df = pd.DataFrame(np.arange(12).reshape(4,3), 
                  columns=list('ABC'))
df['A'] = df['A']%2
print(df)
#    A   B   C
# 0  0   1   2
# 1  1   4   5
# 2  0   7   8
# 3  1  10  11

def calculation(grp):
    grp['C'] = True
    return grp

newdf = df.groupby('A').apply(calculation)
print(newdf)

which yields

   A   B     C
0  0   1  True
1  1   4  True
2  0   7  True
3  1  10  True

edited Aug 14, 2013 at 10:08

answered Aug 1, 2013 at 14:13

unutbu

886k197 gold badges1.9k silver badges1.7k bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

5 Comments

idoda Over a year ago

Thanks for the explanation. I find it quite annoying not being able to tell in advance whether ill get a view or a copy beforehand. This is poor design for my taste. Regarding your last suggestion, the problem is that some files apear in more then one group. so i need to find all appearnces in all groups and modifiy them all. Instead I choose to index by files in advance and change all apearnces in one shot. If you still think there is a better way of doing that, Ill be glad to listen.Can you please tell me, also, Can i acess a group specifically by its name from a groupby object? Thanks alot!

idoda Over a year ago

The suggestion using groupby is not working. The 'isUsed' column is changed inside the 'calculation' function, but the dataframe outside is not changing. Do you know why? can it be that group are also copies of the DF? @unut

idoda Over a year ago

The suggestion using groupby is not working. The 'isUsed' column is changed inside the 'calculation' function, but the dataframe outside is not changing. Do you know why? can it be that group are also copies of the DF?

unutbu Over a year ago

I've edited the last part to include a runnable example showing how column values can be changed from within calculation and affect newdf.

idoda Over a year ago

Thanks, now it is more clear. you have to return the group in order for changes to take affect.

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Changing values in pandas dataframe does not work

1 Answer 1

5 Comments

Your Answer

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

1 Answer 1

5 Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Linked

Related