129

I'm working with a CMS, which prevents editing HTML source for <head> element.

For example I want to add the following above the <title> tag:

<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=EmulateIE7" />
6
  • 8
    This doesn't make sence... The head is parsed prior to the execution of javascript. Adding meta stuf to the head via javascript would not have the desired effect. Commented Dec 14, 2009 at 13:32
  • 1
    @Mickel - yes. answers of all questions helps me Commented Dec 14, 2009 at 15:09
  • 2
    While not related to the CMS question, it can make sense to add meta tags in certain circumstances. There are various browser addons and javascript injections that use data that is in the meta tags to gather information. Facebook's OpenGraph is one example. Injecting meta tags into the head is needed when you don't have direct access to the originating HTML, whether by fault of a CMS or because you are writing a javascript addon/injection yourself. Commented Jan 31, 2011 at 23:07
  • Note that it's possible that adding <meta> tags dynamically will have no effect, depending on what they are and what browser is involved. Commented May 9, 2016 at 14:18
  • Good point, that's what happens when one focuses too much on the problem ;-) Commented May 9, 2016 at 14:21

8 Answers 8

173

You can select it and add to it as normal:

$('head').append('<link />');
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

9 Comments

how can i control order , where this link will be placed
Read the documentation: docs.jquery.com/Manipulation insertBefore, insertAfter is what you want.
I have put this in document.ready, but it doesn't append to my head contents
It is adding link, but link not showing in page's view Source... I can view it from browser development tools like Firebug. Can I view link in view source also?
@PankajTiwari You won't see it in the source view because the code appends it to the current document, not the original source (which was provided by the server). That's why FireBug and Chrome Dev tools are so useful.
|
158

JavaScript:

document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild( ... );

Make DOM element like so:

const link = document.createElement('link');
link.href = 'href';
link.rel = 'rel';

document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(link);

1 Comment

Works with script elements!
33

jQuery

$('head').append( ... );

JavaScript:

document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild( ... );

2 Comments

dosen't appendChild require a DOM-element? ie. var elem = document.createElement() document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild( elem );
well yes. i just left that part as ... because i didn't feel that was a central part of the question, and also, at the time of writing, there was no hands-on example as to what he wanted to put in head. but yes, it does need to be a DOM-element.
18

You can use innerHTML to just concat the extra field string;

document.head.innerHTML = document.head.innerHTML + '<link rel="stylesheet>...'

However, you can't guarantee that the extra things you add to the head will be recognised by the browser after the first load, and it's possible you will get a FOUC (flash of unstyled content) as the extra stylesheets are loaded.

I haven't looked at the API in years, but you could also use document.write, which is what was designed for this sort of action. However, this would require you to block the page from rendering until your initial AJAX request has completed.

1 Comment

You can also use document.head.innerHTML += '<link rel="stylesheet>...' Just Short of your Code
13

In the latest browsers (IE9+) you can also use document.head:

Example:

var favicon = document.createElement('link');
favicon.id = 'myFavicon';
favicon.rel = 'shortcut icon';
favicon.href = 'http://www.test.com/my-favicon.ico';

document.head.appendChild(favicon);

Comments

12

Create a temporary element (e. g. DIV), assign your HTML code to its innerHTML property, and then append its child nodes to the HEAD element one by one. For example, like this:

var temp = document.createElement('div');

temp.innerHTML = '<link rel="stylesheet" href="example.css" />'
               + '<script src="foobar.js"><\/script> ';

var head = document.head;

while (temp.firstChild) {
    head.appendChild(temp.firstChild);
}

Compared with rewriting entire HEAD contents via its innerHTML, this wouldn’t affect existing child elements of the HEAD element in any way.

Note that scripts inserted this way are apparently not executed automatically, while styles are applied successfully. So if you need scripts to be executed, you should load JS files using Ajax and then execute their contents using eval().

6 Comments

That is how I do it in the body, but can that really be done inside the head-tag? I was under the impression that the only allowed tags where base, link, meta, title, style and script?
AFAICT, you have exactly those elements in your Ajax response. Don't you?
Indeed, but I still can't make it work with a div inside the head tag. It seems like Chrome is "smart" enough to display the content of the div in the body anyway.
You've probably not read the answer carefully. ;-) The DIV element is just a temporary container for the purpose of parsing HTML code. You shouldn't insert the DIV itself to the HEAD. You should insert its child nodes. Please see the example I've added to the answer.
@GaetanL. “While there are child elements inside the temp element.” See Node.firstChild() docs.
|
5

Try a javascript pure:

Library JS:

appendHtml = function(element, html) {
    var div = document.createElement('div');
    div.innerHTML = html;
    while (div.children.length > 0) {
        element.appendChild(div.children[0]);
    }
}

Type: appendHtml(document.head, '<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://example.com/example.css"/>');

or jQuery:

$('head').append($('<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />').attr('href', 'http://example.com/example.css'));

Comments

-6

With jquery you have other option:

$('head').html($('head').html() + '...');

anyway it is working. JavaScript option others said, thats correct too.

5 Comments

That will delete the existing content and generate new elements. This can have undesirable side effects such as losing dynamically set DOM properties and causing scripts to be re-executed.
for this reason you should use before $('head').html() to recover all the DOM properties
Using .html() won't recover all the DOM properties. (The most common instance of this problem, and the most visible, is when using similar code to add new fields to a form. The value attribute represents the default value of a field, so getting html() and then setting it back will reset all the existing fields to their default values).
I can sure you I tested it in my code and it is working and all the DOM properties Works. Please, test yourself, I am working IE11
Things that may be removed are events also.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.