I have a method that sometimes returns a NoneType value. So how can I question a variable that is a NoneType? I need to use if method, for example
if not new:
new = '#'
I know that is the wrong way and I hope you understand what I meant.
So how can I question a variable that is a NoneType?
Use is operator, like this
if variable is None:
Why this works?
Since None is the sole singleton object of NoneType in Python, we can use is operator to check if a variable has None in it or not.
Quoting from is docs,
The operators
isandis nottest for object identity:x is yis true if and only ifxandyare the same object.x is not yyields the inverse truth value.
Since there can be only one instance of None, is would be the preferred way to check None.
Hear it from the horse's mouth
Quoting Python's Coding Style Guidelines - PEP-008 (jointly defined by Guido himself),
Comparisons to singletons like
Noneshould always be done withisoris not, never the equality operators.
== None and is None?None, they both will yield similar result.pandas DataFrame exists -- for that, I use type(df) is type(None) to avoid: The truth value of a DataFrame is ambiguousisinstance(instance, type(None)) should be added to make this a complete answer. There are edge cases. For example, if you are building a dynamic tuple of types for validation and the validator is using isinstance (which takes a tuple).It can also be done with isinstance as per Alex Hall's answer :
>>> NoneType = type(None)
>>> x = None
>>> type(x) == NoneType
True
>>> isinstance(x, NoneType)
True
isinstance is also intuitive but there is the complication that it requires the line
NoneType = type(None)
which isn't needed for types like int and float.
NoneType and since None is a singleton, isinstance should not be used to detect None - instead you should do as the accepted answer says, and use is None or is not None.isinstance (which takes a list).assert isinstance(x, str) or x is None will not result in x being inferred as str | None by Pyright, but assert isinstance(x, (str, type(None))) will.As pointed out by Aaron Hall's comment:
Since you can't subclass
NoneTypeand sinceNoneis a singleton,isinstanceshould not be used to detectNone- instead you should do as the accepted answer says, and useis Noneoris not None.
Original Answer:
The simplest way however, without the extra line in addition to cardamom's answer is probably:
isinstance(x, type(None))
So how can I question a variable that is a NoneType? I need to use if method
Using isinstance() does not require an is within the if-statement:
if isinstance(x, type(None)):
#do stuff
Additional information
You can also check for multiple types in one isinstance() statement as mentioned in the documentation. Just write the types as a tuple.
isinstance(x, (type(None), bytes))
NoneType and since None is a singleton, isinstance should not be used to detect None - instead you should do as the accepted answer says, and use is None or is not None.isinstance should not be used ? I understand that is should be preferred, but there are some cases where the isinstance form feels more natural (like checking for multiple types at once isinstance(x, (str, bool, int, type(None)))). Is it just a personal preference or is there caveat that I'm unaware of ?type 2. then calling it 3. then looking up the type of None - when None is both a singleton and a keyword. Another downside: 4. this is very non-standard and will raise eyebrows when people are looking at your code. x is None is a more optimized check. I would suggest x is None or isinstance(x, (str, bool, int)) - but I would also suggest you think more about what you're doing when you're doing that kind of type checking for types that don't have a lot in common...Not sure if this answers the question. But I know this took me a while to figure out. I was looping through a website and all of sudden the name of the authors weren't there anymore. So needed a check statement.
if type(author) == type(None):
print("my if body")
else:
print(" my else body")
Author can be any variable in this case, and None can be any type that you are checking for.
None is a singleton, type should not be used to detect None - instead you should do as the accepted answer says, and use is None or is not None.my else body?!You can test explicitly for NoneType by importing it:
>>> from types import NoneType
or, without import:
>>> NoneType = type(None)
When is this useful?
When you have a variable that's optional which can be either set to its type or to None. Now you want to validate its type using a single isinstance call:
>>> from types import NoneType
>>> foo = 'bar'
>>> assert isinstance(foo, (str, NoneType))
which is equivalent to:
>>> assert isinstance(foo, str) or isinstance(foo, NoneType)
as well as:
>>> assert isinstance(foo, str) or (foo is None)
Python 2.7 :
x = None
isinstance(x, type(None))
or
isinstance(None, type(None))
==> True
NoneType and since None is a singleton, isinstance should not be used to detect None - instead you should do as the accepted answer says, and use is None or is not None.I hope this example will be helpful for you)
print(type(None)) # NoneType
So, you can check type of the variable name
# Example
name = 12 # name = None
if type(name) is type(None):
print("Can't find name")
else:
print(name)
None is a singleton and None is the only instance of NoneType, your example is more complicated than necessary. Just check your variable for None: if name is None: ...
Noneis the only value your method returns for whichbool(returnValue)equalsFalse, thenif not new:ought to work fine. This occurs sometimes in the built-in libs - for example,re.matchreturns either None or a truthy match object.nullandNonein python here.