Java Create Generic Arraylist by Reflection

Question

I am programming object serializer/deserializer classes which need to work on c# and java. I handled the issue in the c# part which is below:

Type listType = typeof(List<>);
                Type constructedListType;

                        type = item.Attributes["Type"].Value;
                        field = item.Attributes["Field"].Value;

                        if ((type == "Int32") || (type == "Int64") || (type == "Int16") || (type == "UInt32") || (type == "UInt64") || (type == "UInt16") || (type == "String") || (type == "Datetime") || (type == "Double") || (type == "Single"))
                        {
                            constructedListType = listType.MakeGenericType(Type.GetType(String.Format("{0}.{1}", "System", type)));
                        }
                        else
                        {
                            constructedListType = listType.MakeGenericType(Type.GetType(String.Format("{0}.{1}", WorkingNamespace, type)));
                        }

                        IList instance = (IList)Activator.CreateInstance(constructedListType);

But I encounter a problem in Java generating generic arraylist with the type of the object that is come from xml.

**Editted

    type = attrMap.getNamedItem("Type").getNodeValue();
        field = attrMap.getNamedItem("Field").getNodeValue();
        type = reverseTypeConvert(type);
        Object oList;
        if ((type.equals("Integer") || type.equals("Long") || type.equals("Float") || type.equals("Short") || type.equals("String") || type.equals("Double") || type.equals("Date"))) {


            oList = Class.forName(String.format("java.util.ArrayList<%s.%s>","java.util",type)).newInstance();                  
        }
        else {

            oList = Class.forName(String.format("java.util.ArrayList<%s.%s>",this.workingPackage,type)).getGenericSuperclass();
        }

        if (!field.equals("none")) {
            Method setMethod = cObj.getClass().getMethod(String.format("%s%s", "set",field), oList.getClass());
            setMethod.invoke(cObj, oList);                  
        }

        deSerializeObject(node.getChildNodes(),oList);

So, I couldn't find the counterpart of c# code in Java. Thanks for any help!

Ok everybody we handle the problem and I understand my mistake. Thank you very much.

Why would you need to do that at runtime? Generics at runtime are really not important — maress
– maress, Commented May 2, 2014 at 13:51
Because I need to cast every element of list instead of casting just arraylist.Beside, I am programming a communication protocol therefore, serilization and deserilization need to be at runtime. Do you have any suggesstion? @maress — misman
– misman, Commented May 2, 2014 at 13:59

Chris Thompson · Accepted Answer · 2014-09-12 02:36:07Z

What you're trying to do fundamentally doesn't work in Java. Actually, it's much easier than what you're trying to do (in some ways). Due to type erasure as pointed out by @ElliottFrisch, at runtime, you eliminate the generic type. The generic is only used by compiler to make sure that you don't add an object to a List, for instance, that you're not expecting. At runtime this:

List<String> strings = new ArrayList<String>();

becomes

List strings = new ArrayList();

Because the compiler knew about it when it compiled it, you can be assured that, unless you do something crazy with reflection or the like, every object in the list will be a String. No class exists for ArrayList<String>, only ArrayList. The generic collections operate only on Objects and the compiler provides the casting when necessary.

TL;DR: Generics are only in place to help you at compile time. Because you're using reflection to deserialize objects, you won't have that anyway (really, typesafety is a compile time construct as well, you can attempt to call any method on any object, it just won't work unless it's implemented). Your code will be responsible for creating the objects that will be added to the generic container and ensuring that all of the objects are of the expected type.

Hirak · Accepted Answer · 2014-05-02 14:07:53Z

0

The Generics in Java is just a compile time trick. Reflection is runtime phenomenon. So there is no need of using generics when you are trying to create a list using reflection. Just create a list with Raw type. It will accept object.

List oList = (List)Class.forName("java.util.ArrayList").newInstance();

Or maybe something like this?

List oList;
        if ((type.equals("Integer") || type.equals("Long") || type.equals("Float") || type.equals("Short") || type.equals("String") || type.equals("Double") || type.equals("Date"))) {


            oList = new ArrayList<Number>();                  
        }
        else {

            oList = new ArrayList<Object>();
        }

answered May 2, 2014 at 14:07

Hirak

3,6491 gold badge24 silver badges34 bronze badges

1 Comment

misman Over a year ago

is there a way doing this ? oList = new ArrayList<TYPE>(); TYPE is the string comes from xml

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Java Create Generic Arraylist by Reflection

2 Answers 2

Comments

1 Comment

Your Answer

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

2 Answers 2

Comments

1 Comment

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Related