0

For a while now we've been having anecdotal slowness on our newly-minted (VMWare-based) SQL Server 2005 database servers. Recently the problem has come to a head and I've started looking for the root cause of the issue.

Here's the weird part: on the stored procedure that I'm using as a performance test case, I get a 30x difference in the execution speed depending on which DB server I run it on. This is using the same database (mdf) and log (ldf) files, detached, copied, and reattached from the slow server to the fast one. This doesn't appear to be a (virtualized) hardware issue: he slow server has 4x the CPU capacity and 2x the memory as the fast one.

As best as I can tell, the problem lies in the environment/configuration of the servers (either operating system or SQL Server installation). However, I've checked a bunch of variables (SQL Server config options, running services, disk fragmentation) and found nothing that has made a difference in testing.

What things should I be looking at? What tools can I use to investigate why this is happening?

Improve this question
2
  • ServerFault.com is a much better place for this question. Commented Mar 18, 2010 at 17:48
  • @Raj: I was wondering about that myself. I've no objections to a mod moving this over to ServerFault. Commented Mar 18, 2010 at 17:54

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
6

Blindly checking variables and settings won't get you very far. You need to approach this methodically.

  1. Are the two procedures executed the same way? Namely, is the plan different? A quick check is to SET STATISTICS IO ON and run the two cases. Is the number of logical-reads the same? Is the number of physical-reads the same? Is the number of writes the same? Differences in logical-reads or writes would indicate a different plan. Differences in physical-reads (while logical-reads is similar) indicate cache and memory problems. If the plans are different, you need to further investigate what is different in the actual execution plan. Does one plan uses a different degree of parallelism? Does one use different join types? Different access paths?
  2. If the plans are similar yet the execution is still different, and you cannot blame the IO subsystem, then you need to check contention. Use SET STATISTICS TIME ON and compare the elapsed time and worker time in the two cases. Similar worker time but different elapsed time indicate that there is more waiting in one case. Use the wait_type and wait_resource info in sys.dm_exec_requests to identify the cause of contention.

The methodology of investigation is discussed in more detail in the Waits and Queues whitepaper.

Improve this answer
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Comments

1

Run SQL Server Profiler to gather information about running processes within SQL Server. This is probably the best start. This will give you a good idea of the things that are consuming a lot of resources.

If you still have issues after Indexing / Rebuilding Indexes, or rewriting queries, then the next step would be to run PerfMon.

Improve this answer

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.