1

I have a problem:

public class PaginationSet
{
    public int TotalItemCount { get; set; }
    public int Page { get; set; }
    public int Amount { get; set; }
    public string Sort { get; set; }
    public string Order { get; set; }

    /// <summary>
    /// This is used to store all the above information in, while still maintaining the automated index count from the internal for loop link builder.
    /// 
    /// Don't forget to pass the index into this!
    /// </summary>
    public Func<int, object> PaginationLinkData
    {
        get
        {
            return index => new
            {
                page = index, // This is the internal pointer part that is used currently by Bootstrap pagination function
                amount = this.Amount,
                sort = this.Sort,
                order = this.Order
            };
        }
    }
}

this.Sort and this.Order are sometimes null. If they are, I would like to not place them inside the returning Func<int,object>... How do i go about doing this?

It might look something like this:

    public Func<int, object> PaginationLinkData
    {
        get
        {
            Func<int,object> something = index => new
            {
                page = index, // This is the internal pointer part that is used currently by Bootstrap pagination function
                amount = this.Amount
            };

            if( this.Sort != null ) 
            {
                something.sort = this.Sort,
                something.order= this.Order
            }

            return something;
        }
    }
}
2
  • I think you can use Expressions for this matter to compile a lambda on the fly. Commented Mar 9, 2015 at 22:50
  • I am going to take a shot at giving you a link that may help you: stackoverflow.com/questions/14663763/… Commented Mar 9, 2015 at 22:51

3 Answers 3

1

Try using expando object...

public Func<int, object> PaginationLinkData
{
    get
    {
        return index =>
            {
                dynamic obj = new ExpandoObject();
                obj.page = index;
                obj.amount = this.Amount;
                if (this.Sort != null)
                {
                    obj.sort = this.Sort;
                }
                if (this.Order != null)
                {
                    obj.order = this.Order;
                }
                return obj;
            };
    }
}
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Comments

1

Can't you just do something like this?

public Func<int, object> PaginationLinkData
    {
        get
        {
            if( this.Sort != null ) 
            {
                return index => new
                {
                    page = index, // This is the internal pointer part that is used currently by Bootstrap pagination function
                    amount = this.Amount,
                    sort = this.Sort,
                    order = this.Order
                };
            }
            else
            {
                return index => new
                {
                    page = index, // This is the internal pointer part that is used currently by Bootstrap pagination function
                    amount = this.Amount,
                };
            }
        }
    }

1 Comment

Lol. Well, I could... lol... Just wanted to be wearing some cool shades instead.
1

I am guessing you are serializing to JSon somewhere. If so and you can use dynamic why not:

/// <summary>
/// This is used to store all the above information in, while still maintaining the automated index count from the internal for loop link builder.
/// 
/// Don't forget to pass the index into this!
/// </summary>
public Func<int, object> PaginationLinkData
{
    get
    {
        dynamic res = new ExpandoObject();

        res.amount = Amount;
        if (Sort != null) res.sort = Sort;
        if (Order != null) res.order = Order;

        return index =>
        {
            res.page = index;
            return res;
        };
    }
}

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.