Incrementing pointer to static allocated array

Question

By how much is pointer incremented in these situations and why?

void f(int a[])
{
    a++;
    printf("%d", *a);
}

void g(int a[][M])
{
    a++;
    printf("%d", *a[0]);
}

Lets say that in main I have a static allocated array with n elements and static allocated matrix (2D array) with n rows and M columns and I'm calling functions f and g (I couldn't write this in code because I was unable to post the question with a lot of code and almost no text).

A pointer is a pointer is a pointer. When you increment a pointer using pointer arithmetic, it increments by an even amount of the byte size of the data type that it is pointing at. You cannot increment an array, but int a[] decays to int *a, so a increments in sizeof(int) steps. int a[][] decays into int **a, so a increments in sizeof(int*) steps. — Remy Lebeau
– Remy Lebeau, Commented May 13, 2015 at 20:14
@RemyLebeau I think in the second example the parameter is adjusted to int (*)[M]. — juanchopanza
– juanchopanza, Commented May 13, 2015 at 20:31
@RemyLebeau There is no array-to-pointer decay going on here. Array parameters are silently rewritten by the compiler to pointer parameters. There is absolutely no difference between void f(int a[]) and void f(int * a). The signatures are completely equivalent. — fredoverflow
– fredoverflow, Commented May 13, 2015 at 20:58

Vlad from Moscow · Accepted Answer · 2015-05-13 20:30:22Z

3

In the both cases the pointers are incremented only once.:)

a++;

Their values are changed by the sizeof of the types of objects they point to. So the value of the first pointer is changed by sizeof( int ) and the value of the second pointer is changed by sizeof( int[M] ) Take into account that parameter int a[][M] is adjusted to int ( *a )[M]

Thus within the functions the both pointers will point to second elements of the arrays. For the two-dimensional array its element is one-dimensional array. And this statement

printf("%d", *a[0]);

will output the first element (integer) of the second "row" of the two-dimensional array.

edited May 13, 2015 at 20:30

answered May 13, 2015 at 20:13

Vlad from Moscow

313k27 gold badges204 silver badges358 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Incrementing pointer to static allocated array

1 Answer 1

Comments

Your Answer

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

1 Answer 1

Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Related