19

I have a group of strings in Javascript and I need to write a function that detects if another specific string belongs to this group or not.

What is the fastest way to achieve this? Is it alright to put the group of values into an array, and then write a function that searches through the array?

I think if I keep the values sorted and do a binary search, it should work fast enough. Or is there some other smart way of doing this, which can work faster?

10 Answers 10

27

Use a hash table, and do this:

// Initialise the set

mySet = {};

// Add to the set

mySet["some string value"] = true;

...

// Test if a value is in the set:

if (testValue in mySet) {
     alert(testValue + " is in the set");
} else {
     alert(testValue + " is not in the set");
}
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

2 Comments

Using the "in" operator is probably the more elegant way of doing it. +1
While trying to dance around AngularJS' ng-if, I came up with this syntax (right after reading this answer): ({value1: 1, value2: 1})[ 'value2' ] - a self-contained map test.
9

Stumbled across this and realized the answers are out of date. In this day and age, you should not be implementing sets using hashtables except in corner cases. You should use sets.

For example:

> let set = new Set();
> set.add('red')

> set.has('red')
true
> set.delete('red')
true
> set.has('red')
false

Refer to this SO post for more examples and discussion: Ways to create a Set in JavaScript?

Comments

8

You can use an object like so:

// prepare a mock-up object
setOfValues = {};
for (var i = 0; i < 100; i++)
  setOfValues["example value " + i] = true;

// check for existence
if (setOfValues["example value 99"]);   // true
if (setOfValues["example value 101"]);  // undefined, essentially: false

This takes advantage of the fact that objects are implemented as associative arrays. How fast that is depends on your data and the JavaScript engine implementation, but you can do some performance testing easily to compare against other variants of doing it.

If a value can occur more than once in your set and the "how often" is important to you, you can also use an incrementing number in place of the boolean I used for my example.

2 Comments

This doesn't work. setOfValues[x] where x is not in the set will not evaluate to undefined, it will produce an error. What you want is: "x in setOfValues" to test for membership.
It will evaluate to undefined. It will not result in an error. Try it out.
6

A comment to the above mentioned hash solutions. Actually the {} creates an object (also mentioned above) which can lead to some side-effects. One of them is that your "hash" is already pre-populated with the default object methods.

So "toString" in setOfValues will be true (at least in Firefox). You can prepend another character e.g. "." to your strings to work around this problem or use the Hash object provided by the "prototype" library.

1 Comment

Thanks for noting this. Yet another reason for me to hate JavaScript.
2

A possible way, particularly efficient if the set is immutable, but is still usable with a variable set:

var haystack = "monday tuesday wednesday thursday friday saturday sunday";
var needle = "Friday";
if (haystack.indexOf(needle.toLowerCase()) >= 0) alert("Found!");

Of course, you might need to change the separator depending on the strings you have to put there...

A more robust variant can include bounds to ensure neither "day wed" nor "day" can match positively:

var haystack = "!monday!tuesday!wednesday!thursday!friday!saturday!sunday!";
var needle = "Friday";
if (haystack.indexOf('!' + needle.toLowerCase() + '!') >= 0) alert("Found!");

Might be not needed if the input is sure (eg. out of database, etc.).

I used that in a Greasemonkey script, with the advantage of using the haystack directly out of GM's storage.

Comments

0

Using a hash table might be a quicker option.

Whatever option you go for its definitely worth testing out its performance against the alternatives you consider.

Comments

0

Depends on how much values there are.

If there are a few values (less than 10 to 50), searching through the array may be ok. A hash table might be overkill.

If you have lots of values, a hash table is the best option. It requires less work than sorting the values and doing a binary search.

2 Comments

i thought everything in JS was a hash table, an arry is just 0=>firstentry, 1=>secondentry isnt it?
@Trull: I doubt it. Array is different from Object, and probably optimized for performance, although it will depend on implementation.
0

I know it is an old post. But to detect if a value is in a set of values we can manipulate through array indexOf() which searches and detects the present of the value

var myString="this is my large string set";
var myStr=myString.split(' ');
console.log('myStr contains "my" = '+ (myStr.indexOf('my')>=0));
console.log('myStr contains "your" = '+ (myStr.indexOf('your')>=0));

console.log('integer example : [1, 2, 5, 3] contains 5 = '+ ([1, 2, 5, 3].indexOf(5)>=0));

Comments

0

You can use ES6 includes.

var string = "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.",
  substring = "lazy dog";

console.log(string.includes(substring));

Comments

0

Here's a very short way of searching for it in a set (using the array includes function):

var animal="pig";
if(["dog","cat","pig","horse"].includes(animal)){
     document.write ("we found the "+animal);
}

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.