(To make things simpler, I'm going to ignore dealing with input.)
First problem is turning on compiler warnings. Most C compilers don't give you warnings by default, you have to ask for them. Usually by compiling with -Wall. Once we do that, the basic problem is revealed.
test.c:6:14: warning: variable 'n' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
int list[n];
^
test.c:5:10: note: initialize the variable 'n' to silence this warning
int n, i;
^
= 0
1 warning generated.
int list[n] immediately creates a list of size n. Since n is uninitialized it will be garbage. You can printf("%d\n", n); and see, it'll be something like 1551959272.
So either n needs to be initialized, or you need to reallocate list dynamically as n changes. Dynamic allocation and reallocation gets complicated, so let's just make it a static size.
So we get this.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main() {
/* Allocate an array of MAX_N integers */
const int MAX_N = 10;
int list[MAX_N];
/* Do Fibonacci */
for(int i = 2; i < MAX_N; i++) {
list[i] = list[i-1]+list[i-2];
}
/* Print each element of the list and its index */
for( int i = 0; i < MAX_N; i++ ) {
printf("%d\n", list[i]);
}
}
That runs, but we get nothing but zeros (or garbage). You have a problem with your Fibonacci algorithm. It's f(n) = f(n-1) + f(n-2) with the initial conditions f(0) = 0 and f(1) = 1. You don't set those initial conditions. list is never initialized, so list[0] and list[1] will contain whatever garbage was in that hunk of memory.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main() {
/* Allocate an array of MAX_N integers */
const int MAX_N = 10;
int list[MAX_N];
/* Set the initial conditions */
list[0] = 0;
list[1] = 1;
/* Do Fibonacci */
for(int i = 2; i < MAX_N; i++) {
list[i] = list[i-1]+list[i-2];
}
/* Print each element of the list and its index */
for( int i = 0; i < MAX_N; i++ ) {
printf("%d\n", list[i]);
}
}
Now it works.
0 0
1 1
2 1
3 2
4 3
5 5
6 8
7 13
8 21
9 34
int list[n];wherenisn't even initialized, let alone constant? Maybe you want to turn your compiler warning level up a bit. You also haven't initialized the base case for the fibonacci sequence (index 0 and 1), so I'm unclear where you think those values are being set.