For example, in Haxe I can create strictly typed variables:
var a:Float = 1.1; or var b:String = "hello" and also dynamic, if needed:
var d:Dynamic = true;
d = 22;
d = "hi";
How do I create this kind of variables in Java?
For example, in Haxe I can create strictly typed variables:
var a:Float = 1.1; or var b:String = "hello" and also dynamic, if needed:
var d:Dynamic = true;
d = 22;
d = "hi";
How do I create this kind of variables in Java?
You can use Object
Object d = true;
d = 22;
d = "hi";
and you can use instanceof operator to check which type of data d is holding
Object d = true;
System.out.println(d instanceof Boolean); // true
d = 22;
d = "hi";
System.out.println(d instanceof Integer); // false
System.out.println(d instanceof String); // true
instanceof is a code smell, usually wafting from a flawed type analysis, and tends to create messy, bug-ridden code unless you know what you're doing.dynamic. That is, d.foo() would check at runtime that d has a foo method.Object strategy described here creates more problems than it solves. You can do what's necessary using generics and run-time type tokens without sacrificing type orientation. This is not a good answer; in fact quite the opposite.You could look at mixing in the groovy language which runs on the JVM. This has type inferrance
Dynamic typing is evil so Java eschewed it. Like Swift and C#, Java is strongly typed, which leads to safer and cleaner code. So give in to the Dark Side and put aside your rebel ways. Embrace the Force of type-oriented programming. You'll be the better for it.
dynamic for dynamic typing. It's useful in some specific scenarios like JSON and interacting with COM.dynamic beautifully allows me to locally bypass the type system to deal with this. There are other solutions, but all of them are uglier and hackier. I wondered how would I have fixed this in Java, found this answer... and now I'm so glad I'm doing this in C#! Funny how limitations can be praised as features. That won't help Java improve.
ObjectI think is what you are looking for.