22

I want to get the name of the current method from within an instance method of a class in Typescript.

(Pseudocode, doesn't work):

class Foo {
    bar() {
        console.log(something); //what should something be?
    }
}

new Foo().bar();

I expect 'something' to return 'bar'. I realize that this can give me the class, and I could somehow get the class and its attributes from it, but I do not know how to get 'this function' (i.e, the method bar, not the class Foo).

I have seen several other questions related to finding the class name, etc. but not one that addresses getting the current method name.

5
  • @Rienk - I am trying to do something more complex (specifically, ruby's method_missing behavior in typescript) , but as a simpler example, assume I have legacy code with (a large number of methods) like getFoo() and getBar(), and I want to handle all these using a getObject(objName) function that parses the function name, and returns the object from a dictionary, by name. I want to call getObject(thisFuncName) in every such function rather than having to change each such function to say things like getObject('foo'), etc.. Commented Aug 17, 2017 at 21:07
  • 2
    There is arguments.callee.name, but it does not work in strict mode, and class methods are executed in strict mode. You could try to use Proxy for that, but not all browsers support proxies.. Commented Aug 17, 2017 at 21:09
  • @Kokodoko I have added a javascript tag Commented Aug 17, 2017 at 21:11
  • @lilezek this is a fairly common feature in dynamic languages - ruby provides an __method__ to return current method name from within each method - see stackoverflow.com/questions/199527/… Commented Aug 17, 2017 at 21:12
  • you can call the function with parameterized name (i think): var instance = new Foo(); instance[methodNameParameter](); Commented Aug 17, 2017 at 21:13

9 Answers 9

24

Besides the arguments.callee.name there is no straightforward way of getting this.

I propose 2 other methods:

Use decorators to inject the method name:

function annotateName(target, name, desc) {
    var method = desc.value;
    desc.value = function () {
        var prevMethod = this.currentMethod;
        this.currentMethod = name;
        method.apply(this, arguments);
        this.currentMethod = prevMethod;   
    }
}

class Foo {
    currentMethod: string;

    @annotateName
    bar() {
        alert(this.currentMethod);
        this.tux();
        alert(this.currentMethod);
    }

    @annotateName
    tux() {
        alert(this.currentMethod);
    }
}

new Foo().bar();

The downside is that you have to annotate all the functions you want to get the name from. You could instead just annotate the class and in the decorator you would iterate over all prototype functions and apply the same idea.


My second option is not standardised and need more care to get consistent results across browsers. It relies on creating an Error object and getting it's stack trace.

class Foo {
    bar() {
        console.log(getMethodName());    
    }
}

function getMethodName() {
    var err = new Error();
    return /at \w+\.(\w+)/.exec(err.stack.split('\n')[2])[1] // we want the 2nd method in the call stack

}

new Foo().bar();
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

2 Comments

please explain where you get this and arguments from in your annotateName function.
@luukvhoudt Both this and arguments are special variables within functions in javascript. Check out developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/… and developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/… respectively.
5

Here is my solution to get the method name.

  /**
   * @description Get log invoker name
   * @return {string} The invoker name
   */
  private static callerName(): string {
    try {
      throw new Error();
    } catch (e) {
      try {
        return e.stack.split('at ')[3].split(' ')[0];
      } catch (e) {
        return '';
      }
    }
  }

2 Comments

you could just do new Error().stack no need to throw it
I don't think I could ever bring myself to do this but it is a really interesting callstack hack.
3

Not sure if this would help, but:

class Foo {
    bar() {
        console.log(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(Foo.prototype)); // ["constructor", "bar"]
    }
}

new Foo().bar();

Comments

1

Keep in mind that during compilation and minification you might lose the actual name of what you're trying to use. You might consider looking into the ts-nameof babel macro that reads the name of virtually anything during compilation and returns it's actual string representation.

Comments

1

I was looking for a solution as well, try this:

class Foo {
  bar() {
      console.log(this.bar.name); // <-- Print out the function name.
  }
}
  
new Foo().bar(); 

What is nice is that you'll get an error if you change the function name, but forget to update the console statement.

1 Comment

but this.bar.name is longer than just typing bar.
0

Just to answer the question with another interesting take, you could do (but shouldn't do) something like this:

class Foo {
    constructor(private http: HttpClient) {

        const apiUrl = 'http://myapi.com/api/';

        {
            const functionName = 'getBar';
            this[functionName] = function () {
                return http.get(apiUrl + functionName);
            }
        }

        {
            const functionName = 'postBar';
            this[functionName] = function () {
                return http.get(apiUrl + functionName);
            }
        }

        {
            const functionName= 'putBar';
            this[functionName] = function () {
                return http.get(apiUrl + functionName);
            }
        }

        {
            const functionName= 'deleteBar';
            this[functionName] = function () {
                return http.get(apiUrl + functionName);
            }
        }
    }
}

It certainly is not an elegant solution, and I can't really imagine a good use case for doing something like this, as I'm pretty sure the compiler doesn't recognize new Foo(http).deleteBar(). Maybe someone can come up with an elegant solution with this idea, I'll leave that as an experiment for someone.

But with this pattern (if you employ some kind of devops scaffolding or "strong copy-paste skills") you can always access your method's name via functionName

Comments

0

function getFunctionName() {
   return getFunctionName.caller.name
}

function foobar() {
  console.log(getFunctionName())
}

foobar() // logs 'foobar' as the currently running function

You can use the .caller property:

A Function object's caller property accessor property represents the function that invoked the specified function. For strict, async function, and generator function callers, accessing the caller property throws an exception.

Although non standard, in my experience the caller property is supported everywhere I have used it (mostly node.js). Check for compatibility before using it. I have only every used it for debugging purposes. For more information, please see

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Function/caller

Comments

0

Seems this question been around for a very long time, thought I'll submit my version as well.

function methodName(): string {
  const stackReg = /at (\w+|new)[\.|\s]?(\w+|\<anonymous\>)/gi;

  const stackPosition = 2;

  const stackList = (new Error().stack || '').split('\n');
  if (stackList.length <= stackPosition) {
    return 'ERROR unknown';
  }

  const currentMethod = stackList[stackPosition];
  const methodName = stackReg.exec(currentMethod);

  if (!methodName || methodName.length < 3) return `FIXME ${currentMethod}`;

  switch (methodName[1]) {
    case 'Object':
      return '<node.js>'; // "run_main" of Node.JS

    case 'new': // Constructor in case we want to format differently
    default:
      return methodName[2];
  }
}

Comments

-1

for class name - Foo.name for method name - this.bar.name

1 Comment

The question was regarding how to get the name of the currently-executing method.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.