Initializing pointer member within structure

Question

I'm trying to write a module that will read a specific address value from a micro controller, the initialization code has compiled on its own but when I try to compile it within a structure it seem to complain. Are there restriction on initializing pointers within a structure?

#include <stdio.h>
#include <esper.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include "lmk04800.h"

#define NUM_MSS_GPIO 32

#define SEL_NIM     3
#define SOURCE_SEL  4
#define SEL_EXT     5
#define CLK0_3_EN   6
#define CLK4_7_EN   7
#define CLK8_11_EN  8
#define CLK12_15_EN 9
#define CLK16_19_EN 10
#define CLK20_23_EN 11
#define LMK_SYNC    12

typedef struct {
  int fd_gpio[NUM_MSS_GPIO];
  uint8_t data_gpio[NUM_MSS_GPIO];
  uint32_t esata_freqCounter;
  uint32_t ext_freqCounter;
  uint32_t esata_trgCounter;
  uint32_t ext_trgCounter;

  tLMK04800 settings;
  volatile uint32_t *freqCounter_addr;
  volatile uint32_t *trgCounter_addr;
  volatile uint32_t *manSync_addr;
  freqCounter_addr = (volatile uint32_t *)0x30000000;
  trgCounter_addr = (volatile uint32_t *)0x30000100;
  manSync_addr = (volatile uint32_t *)0x30000200;

 } tESPERModuleTest;

The compilation error I get is:

test/mod_test.h:32: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'freqCounter_addr'

I'm not sure but defining a pointer as volatile doesn't guarantee anything about the value it points to right? — Jean-François Fabre
– Jean-François Fabre ♦, Commented Oct 5, 2017 at 18:57
Just to confirm - tLMK04800 is specified in lmk04800.h file, right? And lmk04800.h is found by the compiler, right? — Leonardo Alves Machado
– Leonardo Alves Machado, Commented Oct 5, 2017 at 19:03
Why do you think you can assign values in a typedef? You can assign members of structs. — Jens
– Jens, Commented Oct 5, 2017 at 19:18
You provide initial values when declaring a variable, not when declaring a type. There are no automatic defaults for structure members. — Barmar
– Barmar, Commented Oct 5, 2017 at 19:27

Keith Thompson · Accepted Answer · 2017-10-05 19:43:38Z

1

You can't define initial values for struct members when you define the type. It could be useful if it were permitted, and the initial values would be applied automatically to any objects of the type. C just doesn't permit it.

You can only initialize objects.

You've defined a type named tESPERModuleTest. If you want to define and initialize an object of that type, you can do something like this after defining the type (untested code):

tESPERModuleTest obj = {
    .freqCounter_addr = (volatile uint32_t *)0x30000000,
    .trgCounter_addr = (volatile uint32_t *)0x30000100,
    .manSync_addr = (volatile uint32_t *)0x30000200
};

(The other members will be default zero-initialized, or you can provide values for them.)

answered Oct 5, 2017 at 19:43

Keith Thompson

266k46 gold badges447 silver badges668 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

2 Comments

lpaulson Over a year ago

Is here a particular reason why that is?

Keith Thompson Over a year ago

It's probably just meant to keep the language simple. As I recall, C++ has added this feature only fairly recently.

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Initializing pointer member within structure

1 Answer 1

2 Comments

Your Answer

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

1 Answer 1

2 Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Linked

Related