43

Isn't there any way to find the class-type of a generic?

if (T instanceof String) {
    // do something...
}

The above definitely does not compile.

5
  • 2
    is T defined as a generic parameter? please post the entire code that doesn't compile... Commented Jan 16, 2011 at 10:49
  • 3
    Yes, T is a generic parameter. This is the only code you need. Commented Jan 16, 2011 at 10:50
  • 3
    Please see stackoverflow.com/questions/1570073/… Commented Jan 16, 2011 at 10:50
  • Please also note that T is a type, not a variable. Only variables can be used on the left-hand side of the instanceof operator. Commented Aug 22, 2016 at 20:29
  • 1
    I'm so tempted to post the following as a technically correct answer: void functionName(String T)... there, your code works :) Commented Apr 6, 2017 at 15:45

4 Answers 4

58

Generics are a compile time feature. Generics add checks at compile time which may not have any meaning at runtime. This is one example. You can only check the type of the object referenced which could be a super type in code. If you want to pass the type T you have do this explicitly.

void someMethod(Class<T> tClass) {
    if(String.class.isAssignableFrom(tClass)) 

or

void someMethod(Class<T> tClass, T tArg) {

Note: the type might not be the same,

someMethod(Number.class, 1);
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

7 Comments

This is one of those answers that just nailed a bunch of things at once for me.
what is this? e.g. I have T var and how to use it with this method? someMethod(T) won't work... What I don't understand?
@user25 I am not sure what you don't understand. Can you clarify what you mean? It sounds like a different question to me.
@PeterLawrey stackoverflow.com/a/4704909/4548520 this works for me. This one I understood how to use: e.g I have T var and then I have to check type like this: new Test<T>().something(var)
@user25 the only thing you can get here is the var.getClass () there is no way to get T if you do that.
|
5

It won't compile because T is not a variable, but a place holder for a class that is defined at runtime. Here's a quick sample:

public class Test<T> {

public void something(T arg) {
    if (arg instanceof String) {
        System.out.println("Woot!");
    }
}

public static void main(String[] args) {
    Test<String> t = new Test<String>();
    t.something("Hello");
}

}

3 Comments

I don't think that will work in java. see Jon Skeet's answer stackoverflow.com/questions/313584/…
@The Scrum Meister , it works for this specific case. I have tested it.
This will work because you are using instanceof to test against a known type, not a generic. What doesn't work is saying if (foo instanceof T) where foo is some variable, because the type that T represents is not known at compile time.
3

if you have subclass

public class SomeClass extends SomeSubclass<String>{}

and

public class SomeSubclass<T> {}

then there is a way to discover type of T by executing code

Type t = getClass().getGenericSuperclass()
if (t instanceof ParameterizedType) {
    Type[] actualTypeArguments = ((ParameterizedType)t).getActualTypeArguments()
    // in simple cases actualTypeArguments will contain Classes, since Class implements Type
}

if your case are a bit more complex (? extends String)` take a look at org.ormunit.entity.AEntityAccessor#extractClass

Comments

2

If you have specific field you can just check it like below:

private <T> String someMethod(T genericElement)
{
    if (String.class.isInstance(genericElement))
    {
        return (String) genericElement;
    }
...

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.