Messing with initializer_list

Question

So I tried yesterday to start using std::initializer_list but that wasn't a huge success. There is one of my last try:

#include <unordered_map>
#include <string>

     struct XmlState {

        using U_StateFunc = std::function<void()>;
        using U_MapStateFunc = std::unordered_map<std::string, U_StateFunc>;

        U_StateFunc     beforeProcess;
        U_StateFunc     afterProcess;
        U_MapStateFunc  funcMap;

        XmlState
          (U_StateFunc&& bProcess,
           U_StateFunc&& aProcess,
           std::initializer_list<typename U_MapStateFunc::value_type> mapParams)
          : beforeProcess(std::move(bProcess)),
            afterProcess(std::move(aProcess)),
            funcMap(mapParams)
        {}
      };

      template < size_t NB_STATES >
      class XmlParser {

        using U_StateArray = std::array<XmlState, NB_STATES>;
        U_StateArray  m_states;

        public:
          XmlParser
            (std::initializer_list<typename U_StateArray::value_type> states)
            : m_states{states}
          {}

      };

      XmlParser<1>  test {
      {
        {
            XmlState::U_StateFunc(), XmlState::U_StateFunc(),
            {
              { "Tag1", []() {} },
              { "Tag2", []() {} },
              { "Tag3", []() {} }
            }
        }
      }};

int main() {}

Wandbox

I'm wondering why I struggle so much to use this. {} this is a std::initializer_list empty, and {{}} this is one with one element right? But you need to put them inside the constructor like Foo({{}}) ? Or using another list Foo{{{}}}. I mean, this looks simple, but I just can't make it happen.

Btw I'd like to know if it's better to use initializer_list or template parameter pack? Both with move semantic, because there is no temporary object with parameter pack after all?

std::array can use aggregate initialization but it does not have a constructor that can deal with std::initializer_list. — super
– super, Commented Feb 25, 2018 at 13:06
@super I tried with parameter pack without success too. Do you have any clues? — Mathieu Van Nevel
– Mathieu Van Nevel, Commented Feb 25, 2018 at 15:24

super · Accepted Answer · 2018-02-25 16:02:29Z

1

Not sure if this is what you are looking for, but if you change XmlParser to take a U_StateArray in the constructor, you can make the syntax close to your original.

//Changed constructor in XmlParser
XmlParser (U_StateArray states) : m_states{states} {}

//Used like this
XmlParser<2>  test {{

        XmlState(XmlState::U_StateFunc(), XmlState::U_StateFunc(),
        {
          { "Tag1", []() {} },
          { "Tag2", []() {} },
          { "Tag3", []() {} }
        }),

        XmlState(XmlState::U_StateFunc(), XmlState::U_StateFunc(),
        {
          { "Tag4", []() {} },
          { "Tag5", []() {} }
        })

}};

Another option is to change the std::array to a std::vector. Then your code works since std::vector has a constructor for std::initializer_list.

A third option is to make a helper, that takes an std::initializer_list and returns an appropriate std::array. Like suggested here.

edited Feb 25, 2018 at 16:02

answered Feb 25, 2018 at 15:53

super

13k2 gold badges21 silver badges34 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

1 Comment

Mathieu Van Nevel Over a year ago

Just moving a array, simple and efficient. I was too focus on how to foward the arguments ^^" Thanks!

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Messing with initializer_list

1 Answer 1

1 Comment

Your Answer

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

1 Answer 1

1 Comment

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Linked

Related