1

I already have working function in my python script from C++ using boost.

This function is printing me some data (string) To call this function I am using this code:

import cpp as cpp_fun #importing from c++ already compiled with boost (no exe)
file = path_to_file #doesn't matter which file
cpp_fun.strings(file)#gives me output
output:
"this is test string, one line of many.."

I dont even need to use print(cpp_fun.strings()) to print output, so problem is, that I cant add it to variable, and then print this variable, because this function is printing output all the time when I run python.

I want to save output from cpp_fun.strings() to variable but when I am doing :

strings = cpp_fun.strings()

It gives me output again...

I've tried to create method (def()) and put this function inside , but with the same result after all, also i have tried to catch output:

old_stdout = sys.stdout
new_stdout = StringIO()
sys.stdout = new_stdout
print(cp_fun.strings())
output = new_stdout.getvalue()
sys.stdout = old_stdout

But without success, this catch above is working for normal print but not for this one. I've tried also add var=subprocess.check_output([cpp_fun]) -not working Maybe you have any ideas how to save it to variable?

Improve this question
6
  • 1
    Do you have the option of modifying the C++ code? Having it return a value, rather than printing directly to STDOUT, would be by far the simplest solution. Commented Mar 25, 2020 at 16:43
  • Thats the point, i cant modify it:( Commented Mar 25, 2020 at 16:45
  • Then running the code in a subprocess seems to be the only possible solution. Please supply more detail on your attempt than "no success". Commented Mar 25, 2020 at 16:49
  • I tried only add ‘var=subprocess.check_output([cpp_fun])’ Commented Mar 25, 2020 at 16:51
  • That's not running it in a subprocess, that's trying to treat it as a name of a program to run in a subprocess. You need two actual programs to do this, only the inner one will import & run the C++ code. Commented Mar 25, 2020 at 16:53

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
0

Replaced your cpp extension module by a plain Python one, which simply prints every line of the file that it receives as an argument.
Below it's an example of capturing its output.

cpp.py:

def strings(file_name):
    with open(file_name) as f:
        for line in f:
            print(line.rstrip())

code00.py:

#!/usr/bin/env python

import sys
import io
import traceback

import cpp as cpp_fun


def capture_function_output(func, *func_args):
    tmp_buf_out = io.StringIO()
    tmp_buf_err = io.StringIO()
    _sys_stdout = sys.stdout
    sys.stdout = tmp_buf_out
    _sys_stderr = sys.stderr
    sys.stderr = tmp_buf_err
    try:
        func_ret = func(*func_args)
    except:
        func_ret = None
        traceback.print_exc()
    tmp_buf_out.flush()
    tmp_buf_err.flush()
    sys.stdout = _sys_stdout
    sys.stderr = _sys_stderr
    tmp_buf_out.seek(0)
    func_stdout = tmp_buf_out.read()
    tmp_buf_err.seek(0)
    func_stderr = tmp_buf_err.read()
    return func_ret, func_stdout, func_stderr


def test_capture_cpp_fun_output(file_name):
    retcode, sout, serr = capture_function_output(cpp_fun.strings, file_name)  # Store function return code, stdout and stderr contents into 3 variables
    print("Function ({0:s}) returned: {1:}".format(cpp_fun.strings.__name__, retcode))
    print("Function printed to stdout: \n{0:s}".format(sout))
    print("--- Done")
    print("Function printed to stderr: \n{0:s}".format(serr))
    print("--- Done")


def main(*argv):
    for file_name in [
        "dummy.txt",
        "dummy.txt0",  # Doesn't exist!
    ]:
        print("\nTesting file: {0:s}:".format(file_name))
        test_capture_cpp_fun_output(file_name)


if __name__ == "__main__":
    print("Python {0:s} {1:d}bit on {2:s}\n".format(" ".join(item.strip() for item in sys.version.split("\n")), 64 if sys.maxsize > 0x100000000 else 32, sys.platform))
    main(*sys.argv[1:])
    print("\nDone.")

Output:

e:\Work\Dev\StackOverflow\q060851454>sopr.bat
*** Set shorter prompt to better fit when pasted in StackOverflow (or other) pages ***

[prompt]> type dummy.txt
dummy line 0
next line
0123456789

[prompt]> "e:\Work\Dev\VEnvs\py_pc064_03.07.06_test0\Scripts\python.exe" code00.py
Python 3.7.6 (tags/v3.7.6:43364a7ae0, Dec 19 2019, 00:42:30) [MSC v.1916 64 bit (AMD64)] 64bit on win32


Testing file: dummy.txt:
Function (strings) returned: None
Function printed to stdout:
dummy line 0
next line
0123456789

--- Done
Function printed to stderr:

--- Done

Testing file: dummy.txt0:
Function (strings) returned: None
Function printed to stdout:

--- Done
Function printed to stderr:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "code00.py", line 18, in capture_function_output
    func_ret = func(*func_args)
  File "e:\Work\Dev\StackOverflow\q060851454\cpp.py", line 2, in strings
    with open(file_name) as f:
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'dummy.txt0'

--- Done

Done.


Update #0

Changed the code to also capture function's stderr.


Update #1

Adding the [Python 3.Docs]: subprocess - Subprocess management based variant (which works too on my side). This needs an additional script (cpp_wrapper.py, which relies on cpp.py from above).

cpp_wrapper.py:

import sys

import cpp as cpp_fun


if __name__ == "__main__":
    if (len(sys.argv) < 2):
        raise RuntimeError("Missing argument")
    file_name = sys.argv[1]
    try:
        cpp_fun.strings(file_name)
    except:
        raise
else:
    raise RuntimeError("This module should be executed directly")

code01.py:

#!/usr/bin/env python

import sys
import subprocess


def capture_cpp_fun_output(file_name):
    cmd = (sys.executable, "cpp_wrapper.py", file_name)
    p = subprocess.Popen(cmd, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
    out, err = p.communicate()
    return p.returncode, out.decode(), err.decode()


def main(*argv):
    for file_name in [
        "dummy.txt",
        "dummy.txt0",  # Doesn't exist!
    ]:
        print("\nTesting file: {0:s}:".format(file_name))
        retcode, sout, serr = capture_cpp_fun_output(file_name)  # Store function return code, stdout and stderr contents into 3 variables
        print("Function returned: {0:}".format(retcode))
        print("Function printed to stdout: \n{0:s}".format(sout))
        print("--- Done")
        print("Function printed to stderr: \n{0:s}".format(serr))
        print("--- Done")



if __name__ == "__main__":
    print("Python {0:s} {1:d}bit on {2:s}\n".format(" ".join(item.strip() for item in sys.version.split("\n")), 64 if sys.maxsize > 0x100000000 else 32, sys.platform))
    main(*sys.argv[1:])
    print("\nDone.")

Output:

[prompt]> "e:\Work\Dev\VEnvs\py_pc064_03.07.06_test0\Scripts\python.exe" code01.py
Python 3.7.6 (tags/v3.7.6:43364a7ae0, Dec 19 2019, 00:42:30) [MSC v.1916 64 bit (AMD64)] 64bit on win32


Testing file: dummy.txt:
Function returned: 0
Function printed to stdout:
dummy line 0
next line
0123456789

--- Done
Function printed to stderr:

--- Done

Testing file: dummy.txt0:
Function returned: 1
Function printed to stdout:

--- Done
Function printed to stderr:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "cpp_wrapper.py", line 11, in <module>
    cpp_fun.strings(file_name)
  File "e:\Work\Dev\StackOverflow\q060851454\cpp.py", line 2, in strings
    with open(file_name) as f:
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'dummy.txt0'

--- Done

Done.
Improve this answer
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

8 Comments

thanks for your answer, unfortunately it's not working, but i will investigate it more.
What do you mean by "it's not working"? How is it behaving? Could it be that the .dll is outputting text on stderr?
i am receiving output, but i still cant catch it to variable
I modified the answer so that the stderr is captured as well. Perhaps you might want ti give that a shot.
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
|

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.