.NET Core API: "local host refused to connect " when run via Docker

Question

I am trying to run a simple web api via docker.

I have followed all the steps mentioned in the docs.

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/core/sdk:2.2 AS build-env
WORKDIR /app

# Copy csproj and restore as distinct layers
COPY *.csproj ./
RUN dotnet restore

# Copy everything else and build
COPY . ./
RUN dotnet publish -c Release -o out

# Build runtime image
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/core/aspnet:2.2
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=build-env /app/out .
ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "aspnetapp.dll"]

Screenshot:

Commands that I am using to run api via docker:

docker build -t aspnetapp .
docker run -d -p 8080:80 --name myapp aspnetapp

Please note that the api works when I execute the following commands in command line so there is likely nothing wring with the api itself:

dotnet publish -c Release -o out
dotnet run out/ApiForDocker.dll

EDIT:

launchSettings

{
  "$schema": "http://json.schemastore.org/launchsettings.json",
  "iisSettings": {
    "windowsAuthentication": false, 
    "anonymousAuthentication": true, 
    "iisExpress": {
      "applicationUrl": "http://localhost:63852",
      "sslPort": 44318
    }
  },
  "profiles": {
    "IIS Express": {
      "commandName": "IISExpress",
      "launchBrowser": true,
      "launchUrl": "api/values",
      "environmentVariables": {
        "ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT": "Development"
      }
    },
    "ApiForDocker": {
      "commandName": "Project",
      "launchBrowser": true,
      "launchUrl": "api/values",
      "applicationUrl": "https://localhost:5001;http://localhost:5000",
      "environmentVariables": {
        "ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT": "Development"
      }
    }
  }
}

Check the Ports. You try to open localhost:5001, but map the internal port 80 to 8080 on your machine. — Edub
– Edub, Commented Mar 27, 2020 at 7:50
@Edub I corrected the port. Thanks. But its still not working :/ please see my edit — SamuraiJack
– SamuraiJack, Commented Mar 27, 2020 at 7:59
@Edub also why does it always say Now listening on: http://[::]:80 — SamuraiJack
– SamuraiJack, Commented Mar 27, 2020 at 8:29
That's fine the app is listening on Port :80. To be clear you started your container with docker run -d -p 5001:80 --name myapp aspnetapp right? Looks fine to me if it is this way. — Edub
– Edub, Commented Mar 27, 2020 at 10:01
I would change the dockerfile to include EXPOSE 80 command so that the port 80 is opened. Then as you did with the port mapping, the app should be available in the host port which redirects to port 80 of the container. — Jeeva
– Jeeva, Commented Mar 27, 2020 at 10:15

Mohammadreza Askari · Accepted Answer · 2021-12-20 07:17:25Z

19

I'm new on docker and I had same problem when create new mvc core project, with docker debugger on VS2019, trying a lot of things and finally got my answer on this: https://stackoverflow.com/a/69036711/12537072 thank to @ChinaHelloWorld, just edit 'launchSettings.json' and change "publishAllPorts" to false.

"Docker": {
    "commandName": "Docker",
    "launchBrowser": true,
    "launchUrl": "{Scheme}://{ServiceHost}:{ServicePort}",
    "publishAllPorts": false,
    "useSSL": true
}

answered Dec 20, 2021 at 7:17

Mohammadreza Askari

5917 silver badges9 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Comments

Henkolicious · Accepted Answer · 2020-03-27 10:40:16Z

1

It looks right to me.

A useful debugging option is to add RUN ls -al to your runtime step to make sure your are targeting the right app-name.dll entry.

# Build runtime image
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/core/aspnet:2.2
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=build-env /app/out .
RUN ls -al
ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "aspnetapp.dll"]

Then look for the output during build. Or you can ssh into the a running container to verify it.

$ docker exec -it container-id bash.

Also, you can always try switching to another port in Properties > launchSettings.json and then update your Dockerfile entrypoint with that port and --urls-args like:

ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "aspnetapp.dll", "--urls", "http://*:6001"]

Then you also need to map that port on your host machine -p 8080:6001. Also make sure your container is listening to that interface as well (0.0.0.0).

Update

Now when you have provided your launchSettings:

"ApiForDocker": {
  "commandName": "Project",
  "launchBrowser": true,
  "launchUrl": "api/values",
  "applicationUrl": "https://localhost:5001;http://localhost:5000",
  "environmentVariables": {
    "ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT": "Development"
  }
}

You can update your docker entrypoint to:

ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "aspnetapp.dll", "--urls", "http://*:5000"]

and map the container on your host machine with -p 5000:5000 and then localhost:5000/api/values should give you your API GET response on that route in your browser.

edited Mar 27, 2020 at 10:40

answered Mar 27, 2020 at 10:15

Henkolicious

1,4313 gold badges19 silver badges39 bronze badges

6 Comments

SamuraiJack Over a year ago

Bingo! it's working now. This is the first time I have run an app in Docker! Yeey! Couple of questions here: 1. What is the relationship between "applicationUrl" and "http://*:5000"? 2. Can I not have ""https://*" ? 3. How do I map multiple host ports to a single docker port?

Henkolicious Over a year ago

Congratz! Well, you are building a web server called kestrel with .NET Core which you are hosting in a docker container. 1. The applicationUrl is the startup option for your kestrel web server I believe . And the * part I think exposes interface 0.0.0.0. --urls is actually a dotnet thing: learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/host/…

Henkolicious Over a year ago

2. Not sure what you mean. 3. When you start your container, just add the -pargument for port mapping between your host and the running container. Like -p 5000:5000 -p 3333:5000 and browse to localhost:5000/api/values or localhost:3333/api/values and you will hit the same running container.

SamuraiJack Over a year ago

2. I meant can i not have https instead of http as you have mentioned "http://*:5000" 3. I get that I could map ports with -p What I meant was Can I map multiple host ports to single docker port at the same time? For eg/ localhost:3333 and localhost:3334 both should be mapped to port 80 in docker. I dont think I can do docker run -d -p 3333,3334:80

Henkolicious Over a year ago

2. Well of course you can use SSL on kestrel, but then you need to place your certificate in the container (or via volumes) and tell kestrel to use that certificate I believe. When you run this command in docker RUN dotnet publish -c Release -o out your local developer cert is not legit hence it's a release configuration. 3. Maybe I don't understand your question on what you're trying to achieve here. Do you want to map your host machine (your PC) ports localhost:3333 and localhost:3334 to your running container port localhost:80?

|

Razban · Accepted Answer · 2024-05-13 08:34:25Z

0

I believe this issue is due to containers not being able to see each other, normally for those who are working with docker in devenv this would happen. my case was i could call my Api from postman but in the frontend code got this exception: Connection refused to localhost:someport

in dev environment I solved the issue by replacing localhost with host.docker.internal. for example just change https://localhost:443 to https://host.docker.internal:443 and all would works fine. if you like to dig a little bit deeper i recommend starting from here: https://docs.docker.com/desktop/networking/

Cheers WLF

answered May 13, 2024 at 8:34

Razban

11 bronze badge

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

.NET Core API: "local host refused to connect " when run via Docker

3 Answers 3

Comments

6 Comments

Comments

Your Answer

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

3 Answers 3

Comments

6 Comments

Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Linked

Related