What I have:
array(
[
'id' => 12, 'group' => 'abc', 'name' => 'Lorem',
],
[
'id' => 12, 'group' => 'def', 'name' => 'Ipsum',
],
[
'id' => 34, 'group' => 'ghi', 'name' => 'Dolor',
],
[
'id' => 34, 'group' => 'jkl', 'name' => 'Sit',
],
[
'id' => 34, 'group' => 'mno', 'name' => 'Amet',
],
);
What I want:
array (size=2)
12 =>
array (size=2)
'abc' =>
array (size=3)
'id' => int 12
'group' => string 'abc' (length=3)
'name' => string 'Lorem' (length=5)
'def' =>
array (size=3)
'id' => int 12
'group' => string 'def' (length=3)
'name' => string 'Ipsum' (length=5)
34 =>
array (size=3)
'ghi' =>
array (size=3)
'id' => int 34
'group' => string 'ghi' (length=3)
'name' => string 'Dolor' (length=5)
'jkl' =>
array (size=3)
'id' => int 34
'group' => string 'jkl' (length=3)
'name' => string 'Sit' (length=3)
'mno' =>
array (size=3)
'id' => int 34
'group' => string 'mno' (length=3)
'name' => string 'Amet' (length=4)
What I tried:
The obvious:
$sorted = array();
foreach ($products as $product) {
$sorted[$product['id']][$product['group']] = $product;
}
$products = $sorted;
unset($sorted);
But then, in an effort to avoid foreach() loops, and with help of @atomrc's answer to How to group subarrays by a column value?, I came up with this:
$sorted = array_reduce($products, function ($accumulator, $element) {
$accumulator[$element['id']][] = $element;
return $accumulator;
}, []);
array_walk($sorted, function(&$item) {
$item = array_reduce($item, function ($accumulator, $element) {
$accumulator[$element['group']] = $element;
return $accumulator;
}, []);
});
So while the above looks cool and all, it's also much bigger and seemingly more complex than that foreach. This is probably because my experience with array_reduce() is limited. Is there a way to have the array grouped in one go? For example, in the first array_reduce() call.
foreachloop?array_reduceandarray_walkjust do one internally anyway...foreachcan actually be faster in some situations than using PHP's built in array functions (based on peoples benchmarks in the past) so there's no reason to avoidforeach. It of course depends on many factors. Usingforeachis absolutely fine though.foreachin your case and use callback-functions. Becasueforeachfaster, with less overhead, with shorter and much more understandable code. Do not blindly follow the recommendation from that article to awoidforeacheverywhere.