1

I need to order these file names (and I can't change them):

  • file_31_stable.sql
  • file_32_stable.sql
  • file_310_stable.sql
  • file_41_stable.sql
  • file_42_stable.sql
  • file_410_stable.sql

This is also the expected order that I want to display them, because I have to get the last one.

When I use the command

find ./databases/ -iname file_*.sql | sort -V

The output is this:

file_31_stable.sql
file_32_stable.sql
file_41_stable.sql
file_42_stable.sql
file_310_stable.sql
file_410_stable.sql

There is a form to order using the first number of the file and then the rest, or a command that will display the expected order?

0

1 Answer 1

2

Without any separators, version 310 is obviously newer than version 41.

If you can devise a way to automatically add a separator, of course do that. Maybe

find ./databases/ -iname 'file_*.sql' |
sed 's/^\([^_]*_\)\([0-9]\)\([0-9]*\)/\2.\3\t\1\2\3/' |
sort -k1 -V |
cut -f2-

if you know the major version must always be a single digit; but obviously, in the general case, no such assumptions can be made.

This adds a column before the actual value, sorts on that, and then peels off the added column; see also Schwartzian transform. Before the cut, the output from sort looks like

3.1     file_31_stable.sql
3.2     file_32_stable.sql
3.10    file_310_stable.sql
4.1     file_41_stable.sql
4.2     file_42_stable.sql
4.10    file_410_stable.sql

If your sed does not recognize \t as a tab, maybe try putting a literal tab (I can't do that here because Stack Overflow renders tabs as spaces).

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

2 Comments

sort -n may be better than “normalizing” the numbers manually…
No, that would put 3.12 between 3.1 and 3.2

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.