1

Is having an additional checkbox to select all redundent and add unneeded complexity? The user frequently (maybe 40% of the time) selects numbers 1-33 as option so I would like to add a checkbox that selects those numbers. However it is not hard to select all then uncheck L and 34-62. So I don't know if I'm wasting time here making it worse. The user would be educated on what the new T box does so that is not a problem.

enter image description here

Improve this question

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1

This is a question for your users. I encourage A/B testing, one with the 1-33 checkbox, one without.

But if I were you, I think the 40% data is enough to convince stakeholders that a 1-33 checkbox would be helpful.

Improve this answer
2
  • Nothing that formal honestly I can do whatever I want just making something for internal department use. Commented Sep 11, 2021 at 3:01
  • 1
    Well, UX isn't UX without data. Ask your users even if they're internal. Commented Sep 11, 2021 at 4:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.