Java Interface implementation with object

Question

I have a question regarding interfaces. I have a interface that has all the methods of a class called GameWorld. The GameWorld holds a class called GameObject that can be tanks, rocks, missiles, etc.

public interface IGameWorld
{
public Point getLocation(); // GameObject
public Color getColor();
public void setLocation(Point newCoord);
public void setColor(Color newColor);
}

I want to implement the methods in IGameWorld in GameWorld's GameObject class. Something like this.

public class GameWorld implements IGameWorld
{
  // vector to hold gameobjects
public class GameObject 
{
 private Point location;
 private Color color;     // all objects have a random color     
GameObject()
{
  // method 
}
public Point getLocation()
{
  // method
}
public Color getColor()
{
  // method
}
public void setLocation (Point newCoord)
{
  // method
}
public void setColor (Color newColor)
{
  // method
}
 }
}

Is that possible? And if not, what is the alternative to doing this? Thanks.

That is what interfaces are for isn't it?

Antoniossss
– Antoniossss

2013-10-30 06:34:03 +00:00
Commented Oct 30, 2013 at 6:34 — Antoniossss
– Antoniossss, Commented Oct 30, 2013 at 6:34

Aniket Thakur · Accepted Answer · 2013-10-30 06:36:14Z

1

You make instances/objects of classes. No need to define a separate class which represent your object. Anyway what you have done is wrong because class GameWorld implements IGameWorld and GameWorld must implement all the methods and not GameObject class.

You can remove GameObject class

public class GameWorld implements IGameWorld
{
 private Point location;
 private Color color;     // all objects have a random color     
public Point getLocation()
{
  // method
}
public Color getColor()
{
  // method
}
public void setLocation (Point newCoord)
{
  // method
}
public void setColor (Color newColor)
{
  // method
}
}

and then make instances/objects of this concrete class

IGameWorld gameObject = new GameWorld();

answered Oct 30, 2013 at 6:36

Aniket Thakur

69.4k43 gold badges290 silver badges299 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

1 Comment

thebulge Over a year ago

Thanks. I'll get back to you in a bit to see if it works out.

Shoaib Chikate · Accepted Answer · 2013-10-30 06:42:38Z

0

To above answer I would like to add that using interfaces makes our code as loosely coupled. So instead of using GameObject use interface where ever you need.

And your interface defines the common methods which are required for all the classes to create game and hence we can use as:

 IGameWorld marioGame = new GameWorld();
 IGameWorld tankGame = new GameWorld();

etc.

answered Oct 30, 2013 at 6:42

Shoaib Chikate

8,97112 gold badges50 silver badges70 bronze badges

Comments

Matthew · Accepted Answer · 2013-10-30 07:01:53Z

0

I don't think your GameObject class should be inside your GameWorld class. Try making them public classes in separate files. Then, only GameWorld will implement IGameWorld and your other classes (you mentioned tanks, rocks, missiles, etc.) will extend GameObject.

answered Oct 30, 2013 at 7:01

Matthew

1231 silver badge9 bronze badges

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Java Interface implementation with object

3 Answers 3

1 Comment

Comments

Comments

Your Answer

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

3 Answers 3

1 Comment

Comments

Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Related