16

Is it possible to have an enum of enums in Python? For example, I'd like to have

enumA
    enumB
        elementA
        elementB
    enumC
        elementC
        elementD

And for me to be able to refer to elementA as enumA.enumB.elementA, or to refer to elementD as enumA.enumC.elementD.

Is this possible? If so, how?

EDIT: When implemented in the naive way:

from enum import Enum

class EnumA(Enum):
    class EnumB(Enum):
        member = 0

print(EnumA)
print(EnumA.EnumB.member)

It gives:

<enum 'EnumA'>
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "Maps.py", line 15, in <module>
    print(EnumA.EnumB.member)
AttributeError: 'EnumA' object has no attribute 'member'
5
  • First, you'll have to actually write this in Python syntax, using the stdlib enum module or a third-party one. So… have you tried it? What happens? Commented May 27, 2015 at 1:58
  • I'm curious - why do you need this functionality in the first place? What is the specific use case for this? Commented May 27, 2015 at 2:03
  • 1
    @inspectorG4dget I want to provide a system for classifying objects in my RPG engine's generic object system. For example one might classify an object as terrain.rocks.smallRock or as weapons.melee.swords.shortSword. Is there a better way? Commented May 27, 2015 at 2:05
  • 1
    That seems like it should be dynamic information, not static—in other words, something you store in a string or a tuple, not as part of the type. Unless this is meant to be used for an embedded Python console or something? Commented May 27, 2015 at 2:20
  • Object types, in the object engine, are immutable - though I'm now reconsidering that. Commented May 27, 2015 at 3:26

7 Answers 7

18

You can't do this with the enum stdlib module. If you try it:

class A(Enum):
    class B(Enum):
        a = 1
        b = 2
    class C(Enum):
        c = 1
        d = 2

A.B.a

… you'll just get an exception like:

AttributeError: 'A' object has no attribute 'a'

This is because the enumeration values of A act like instances of A, not like instances of their value type. Just like a normal enum holding int values doesn't have int methods on the values, the B won't have Enum methods. Compare:

class D(Enum):
    a = 1
    b = 2

D.a.bit_length()

You can, of course, access the underlying value (the int, or the B class) explicitly:

D.a.value.bit_length()
A.B.value.a

… but I doubt that's what you want here.


So, could you use the same trick that IntEnum uses, of subclassing both Enum and int so that its enumeration values are int values, as described in the Others section of the docs?

No, because what type would you subclass? Not Enum; that's already your type. You can't use type (the type of arbitrary classes). There's nothing that works.

So, you'd have to use a different Enum implementation with a different design to make this work. Fortunately, there are about 69105 different ones on PyPI and ActiveState to choose from.


For example, when I was looking at building something similar to Swift enumerations (which are closer to ML ADTs than Python/Java/etc. enumerations), someone recommended I look at makeobj. I forgot to do so, but now I just did, and:

class A(makeobj.Obj):
    class B(makeobj.Obj):
        a, b = makeobj.keys(2)
    class C(makeobj.Obj):
        c, d = makeobj.keys(2)

print(A.B, A.B.b, A.B.b.name, A.B.b.value)

This gives you:

<Object: B -> [a:0, b:1]> <Value: B.b = 1> b 1

It might be nice if it looked at its __qualname__ instead of its __name__ for creating the str/repr values, but otherwise it looks like it does everything you want. And it has some other cool features (not exactly what I was looking for, but interesting…).

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

9 Comments

Thank you. That makes a lot more sense now. How would you suggest going about what I have in mind? See my comment on the OP.
@SilverWingedSeraph: As I said at the end, I'd first look through PyPI and ActiveState at all of the other enum implementations and see if one of them has a design closer to what you want. What you're asking for seems reasonable, it's just not the design the stdlib went with, so there's a good chance someone else did.
Thank you. I've decided to go with a different system for now, but I'll come back to this question at some point and take a look at those.
Actually, it can be done. Mind you, I'm not saying it's a good idea (yet). Check my answer if your curious.
@EthanFurman Well, your answer doesn't actually have Enum values, it has Constant values. Of course you are using Enum types to define those Constant instances, so it kind of looks like you're using Enums all the way down. I think that's likely to be more misleading than helpful, but it's worth having the answer--anyone who reads it and figured out how it works will learn some useful stuff, if nothing else.
|
10

Note The below is interesting, and may be useful, but as @abarnert noted the resulting A Enum doesn't have Enum members -- i.e. list(A) returns an empty list.


Without commenting on whether an Enum of Enums is a good idea (I haven't yet decided ;) , this can be done... and with only a small amount of magic.

You can either use the Constant class from this answer:

class Constant:
    def __init__(self, value):
        self.value = value
    def __get__(self, *args):
        return self.value
    def __repr__(self):
        return '%s(%r)' % (self.__class__.__name__, self.value)

Or you can use the new aenum library and its built-in skip desriptor decorator (which is what I will show).

At any rate, by wrapping the subEnum classes in a descriptor they are sheltered from becoming members themselves.

Your example then looks like:

from aenum import Enum, skip

class enumA(Enum):
    @skip
    class enumB(Enum):
        elementA = 'a'
        elementB = 'b'
    @skip
    class enumC(Enum):
        elementC = 'c'
        elementD = 'd'

and you can then access them as:

print(enumA)
print(enumA.enumB)
print(enumA.enumC.elementD)

which gives you:

<enum 'enumA'>
<enum 'enumB'>
enumC.elementD

The difference between using Constant and skip is esoteric: in enumA's __dict__ 'enumB' will return a Constant object (if Constant was used) or <enum 'enumB'> if skip was used; normal access will always return <enum 'enumB'>.

In Python 3.5+ you can even (un)pickle the nested Enums:

print(pickle.loads(pickle.dumps(enumA.enumC.elementD)) is enumA.enumC.elementD)
# True

Do note that the subEnum doesn't include the parent Enum in it's display; if that's important I would suggest enhancing EnumMeta to recognize the Constant descriptor and modify its contained class' __repr__ -- but I'll leave that as an exercise for the reader. ;)

Comments

8

I made an enum of enum implementing de __ getattr __ in the base enum like this

def __getattr__(self, item):
    if item != '_value_':
        return getattr(self.value, item).value
    raise AttributeError

In my case I have an enum of enum of enum

class enumBase(Enum):
    class innerEnum(Enum):
        class innerInnerEnum(Enum):
           A

And

enumBase.innerEnum.innerInnerEnum.A

works

5 Comments

This for me is the best answer, as someone who has a huge library and dependent on enum, its difficult to change to a whole new library. Also return getattr(self.value, item).value if changed to return getattr(self.value, item) would be great! Value is accessible through enum, so the design remains constant.
@kingspp: aenum is a drop-in replacement for the stdlib enum.
I didn't get why, but it works. Could you explain the mechanics?
this should be the answer. Clean and concise, making use only of the standard library.
Some explanation to why this works can be found at: stackoverflow.com/a/54950492
2

If you don't care about inheritance, here's a solution I've used before:

class Animal:
    class Cat(enum.Enum):
        TIGER = "TIGER"
        CHEETAH = "CHEETAH"
        LION = "LION"

    class Dog(enum.Enum):
        WOLF = "WOLF"
        FOX = "FOX"

    def __new__(cls, name):
        for member in cls.__dict__.values():
            if isinstance(member, enum.EnumMeta) and name in member.__members__:
                return member(name)
        raise ValueError(f"'{name}' is not a valid {cls.__name__}")

It works by overriding the __new__ method of Animal to find the appropriate sub-enum and return an instance of that.

Usage:

Animal.Dog.WOLF                    #=> <Dog.WOLF: 'WOLF'>
Animal("WOLF")                     #=> <Dog.WOLF: 'WOLF'>
Animal("WOLF") is Animal.Dog.WOLF  #=> True
Animal("WOLF") is Animal.Dog.FOX   #=> False
Animal("WOLF") in Animal.Dog       #=> True
Animal("WOLF") in Animal.Cat       #=> False
Animal("OWL")                      #=> ValueError: 'OWL' is not a valid Animal

However, notably:

isinstance(Animal.Dog, Animal)     #=> False

As long as you don't care about that this solution works nicely. Unfortunately there seems to be no way to refer to the outer class inside the definition of an inner class, so there's no easy way to make Dog extend Animal.

Comments

1

You can use namedtuples to do something like this:

>>> from collections import namedtuple
>>> Foo = namedtuple('Foo', ['bar', 'barz'])
>>> Bar = namedtuple('Bar', ['element_a', 'element_b'])
>>> Barz = namedtuple('Barz', ['element_c', 'element_d'])
>>> bar = Bar('a', 'b')
>>> barz = Barz('c', 'd')
>>> foo = Foo(bar, barz)
>>> foo
Foo(bar=Bar(element_a='a', element_b='b'), barz=Barz(element_c='c', element_d='d'))
>>> foo.bar.element_a
'a'
>>> foo.barz.element_d
'd'

This is not a enum but, maybe solves your problem

1 Comment

Thank you. While this doesn't solve my problem, it's very useful to know. +1
1

Try this:

# python3.7
import enum


class A(enum.Enum):
    def __get__(self, instance, owner):
        return self.value
    
    class B(enum.IntEnum):
        a = 1
        b = 2
    
    class C(enum.IntEnum):
        c = 1
        d = 2
    
    # this is optional (it just adds 'A.' before the B and C enum names)
    B.__name__ = B.__qualname__
    C.__name__ = C.__qualname__


print(A.C.d)        # prints: A.C.d
print(A.B.b.value)  # prints: 2

1 Comment

Note: DeprecationWarning: In 3.13 classes created inside an enum will not become a member. Use the member decorator to keep the current behavior.
0

Solution based on attrs. This also allows to implement attributes validators and other goodies of attrs:

import enum

import attr


class CoilsTypes(enum.Enum):
    heating: str = "heating"


class FansTypes(enum.Enum):
    plug: str = "plug"


class HrsTypes(enum.Enum):
    plate: str = "plate"
    rotory_wheel: str = "rotory wheel"


class FiltersTypes(enum.Enum):
    bag: str = "bag"
    pleated: str = "pleated"


@attr.dataclass(frozen=True)
class ComponentTypes:
    coils: CoilsTypes = CoilsTypes
    fans: FansTypes = FansTypes
    hrs: HrsTypes = HrsTypes
    filter: FiltersTypes = FiltersTypes


cmp = ComponentTypes()
res = cmp.hrs.plate

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.